Home

Is it just me or is the M leaning a little too far forward, in contrast to the O & A?

maybe just a little bit (but not much). also, have you tried bumping up the \'m\' and \'a\' a few clicks? really like how this one turned out, josh.

Josh, I think 'noma looks good, A needs some work?

Thanks for input guys, it\'s certainly not \'there\' yet :)

@Colin; bump up as in size, weight or position?

@Mike; A bit busy is it?

position, sorry. as for the \'A\' i would like to see it without that swash going out to the left. not that it\'s a bad thing at all, just would like to see how it works with a simpler solution. perhaps the \'An\' crossbar could finish out to the left instead?these are all thoughts, josh...feel free to ignore because i really do like what you\'ve done here.

Yeah I think so, keep going back to the A, maybe the right side needs more lean to it??

Thanks guys!!!

@Colin - All good, just clarifying :) I definitley agree that this can be streamlined/simplified further.

@Mike Angles clashing :)

the hand sketch looks better than the white on blue :D

what is the original typography?

BuffetScript ;) alternates A and a are in the glyphs
http://sudtipos.com/fonts/27

lol non mais toi tu les connais vraiment toutes par coeur ;)
bise

A hand sketch doesn't scale as well :D

Thanks peeps :) And yes, the working template was Buffet Script, the biggest difference is the treatment of the N.

I actually always prefered the serif option, as in my opinion it was better for longevity...but c'est la vie :)

'A hand sketch doesn't scale as well :D' hahah yeah i know but if you could vectorized it :D

Just wait till when this becomes science fact; http://i-cdn.apartmenttherapy.com/uimages/at/ChrisPerez/tony_stark_interactive_3d_hologram.jpg