Ah, always so nice to see new work from you, Roy. This is great. I really like how you managed the 'S' in there in addition to the 'B'. One really minor nit-picky thing (that you may have already tried and it doesn't look good), have you considered rounding that edge right below the bottom vine on the left side of the 'B' (where it cuts into the 'B')? Does that make sense?
Lets Discuss
I like this.*It's memorable and would be nice for branding.*Clean, elegant and simple.
Replyyeah, i feel this!
ReplyAh, always so nice to see new work from you, Roy. This is great. I really like how you managed the 'S' in there in addition to the 'B'. One really minor nit-picky thing (that you may have already tried and it doesn't look good), have you considered rounding that edge right below the bottom vine on the left side of the 'B' (where it cuts into the 'B')? Does that make sense?
ReplyThanks guys. That's a good point Kevin. I did exactly that on version 2...I'll give it a shot.
ReplyThe man can do no wrong. Nice work, as per usual. Fav'd, floated, yada, yada, yada...
Replythis is the best of the group.
ReplyI love this one.
ReplyI like this one.
ReplyYep, this one makes sense better than more pronounced one :)
ReplyI'd go with this one...although, the logotype of v3 can handle its own too :)
Replyreally really nice my friend !
ReplyThanks for looking everyone. Opinion seems to be evenly split between v1 and v2.
ReplyPlease login/signup to make a comment, registration is easy