Ricky

by Logomotive • Uploaded: Oct. 07 '13

1370427fc93f10af636f9c648aa8ea65.png

Add to Pad (In 1 Pad )

Description: Logo Created using my Milkman font.
Status: Unused proposal
Viewed: 1825
Tags: typography font Milkman Logo
Share:  

Lets Discuss

Limpuls Oct. 10 '13

Sorry but this is joke? Logo is fine, bet I don't think that is good enough for featured gallery :?

Reply
logomotive Oct. 10 '13

^ That's Ok Understandable, Rickey did not by into it either. Just a font I created and used here. You can purchase it. might come in handy :)

Reply
ClimaxDesigns Oct. 10 '13

yeah, not sure who added this one, its solid, but not one of your best, i just added another lmao so many to choose from :D

Reply
logomotive Oct. 11 '13

well It's OK. I've seen other 'just' script on FP that had me scratching my head, all good though... BTW LP is slow these days, like one or 2 comments per day. It used to be like 5 pages of comments. :) times have changed.

Reply
Type and signs Oct. 13 '13

Rick(e)y ... don't loose that number ... nice one logomike !!

Reply
logomotive Oct. 18 '13

:)- took me a while to figure that out.1974 How old are you TAS?? :) Thanks!

Reply
logomotive Oct. 18 '13

Figured ya had to be born in the 60's to know that song. You're an older fart than me. :)

Reply
Type and signs Oct. 18 '13

that's right, mate !! ;D except that I wrote something like 50 plus ... but the Pont ignores the plus sign ...
But age don't count ...

Reply
logomotive Oct. 18 '13

born in the 50's???

Reply
logomotive Mar. 29 '15

For the Record This Logo was not deemed worthy of Gallery! No complaints though.

Reply
logomotive Mar. 29 '15

I've even deleted some of my logos in Gallery because I felt they were not worthy.

Reply
ClimaxDesigns Mar. 29 '15

Don't do that, leave em in there. Might not seem worthy to you, but they are to the rest of us

Reply
logomotive Mar. 29 '15

All Good using My post to make a statement. Sometimes Our stuff does just does not cut the mustard for whatever reason. Clients disagree and designers disagree.

Reply
notjelly Mar. 29 '15

I'm commenting here to avoid furthering the over-commenting on the unsuspecting designer of the other logo. I just wanted to say that I appreciate the (pardon the pun) fluid nature of the logopond gallery. I get that there is no "perfect" system to handle the gallery but I think keeping it at as high of a standard as possible is beneficial to all involved. It keeps the credibility of the gallery intact, it makes it an honor to be included in the collection, it spurs designers to new levels of skill and creativity, etc.

Design, while at some levels is subjective, at the end of the day it has to work, it has to fulfill its objective goals. I've always found logopond to be fairly successful at highlighting the logos that do just that.

Reply

Please login/signup to make a comment, registration is easy