Jan. 01 '09
Unused concept that I worked on when developing my own identity. Could be for a blog.
Add to Pad
damn this one is pretty sick.. I like it.
Just perfect LGB.
Memorable! Cool stuff:)
A pretty sick, just perfect, jig inducing design! Couldn't ask for a better response. Thanks guys.
And I almost forgot "memorable". Thanks nex.
Oh and file this too Glen, "not too shabby".
Nice color,type and mark it's clean as a whistle bro. good one.
Very memorable indeed. Love it, Glen.
Thanks Mike/Kev/Roy (maybe this one should've been my personal logo).
and it has a much better looking face too ;)
Here's lookin' at you...nido.
Did you end up not using it cause it felt to "business like" (for lack of a better term) for a personal/designer mark. Bet you could sell it off no prob.
@ joder: it came down to the 2 names (LoGoBoom and Logophile). I was torn but close associates swayed me to go with LoGoBoom because it was more fun and not as conservative (as you alluded). I still like both though.
besides it sounds better than logophile might be considered as one that abuses logos.;-)
And you're welcome to it Jon...I won't fight you for either of those.
Now you sound like a client wilson!
the folder tabs really make this one... it's great!
Thanks for the comment logotivity
Another great addition to your portfolio. Kudos Glen!
Hey thanks dijock!
I think the face is equal to on of the delicious icons
I would agree that the face is not really unique. It's so simplified.
... but you are sexy!
...I'm also strangely uncomfortable.
that shows in your face too...
Yes, but not as sexy as your logos bro.
Thanks nido, mike, optimus!
What a cool idea!
Thank you jerron.
Thanks Guy. Too much is never enough.
Are you the same poster that posted that? If so nice to see a good logo found a place, and if not, shame on the steal.
Are you the same poster that posted that? If so nice to see a good logo found a place, and if not, shame on the stealer.
"This project is awarded" Oops!
No, I certainly did not post that. Thanks for the heads up numerous.
What do you guys think? Inspiration or plagarism?
Pretty close to call Glen. Not to belittle your logo, but the basis of it (a box with files in it) is simple enough that it's possible that the other designer happened upon a similar execution. However, with that being said, taking into consideration the size and perspective of both boxes and files as well as the amount of files (4) and the overall shape of the file tabs, I'd say that it's pretty much dead on with yours - so much so that I find it more than just coincidental. I say it's a rip.
Glen, have you laid the two images over on another in photoshop with say 60% opacity? If the lines match up then its more than a coincidence if perspective is identical IMO.
I emailed back and forth with the designer. She was very professional. She agreed to change her design and even showed me two new comps that she was submitting to her client explaining the conflict. So seems like this one ends well. Thanks a lot guys.
So I'm assuming it was a case of "borrowed interest" on her part and that she admitted to it?
She claimed to never have seen this. I did not press the issue since was very quick to adjust and to explain to her client. Can't ask for more than that I suppose. Appreciate, again, the comments.
This is great work. Love it. Nice job, logoboom.
really nice work here. i've missed some solid logos from logopond past.
Thanks Colin...I still need to do something with this one.
I see a face!
Really nice ...
Please login/signup to make a comment, registration is easy