Unused Icon

by OcularInk • Uploaded: Nov. 17 '07

0c8629f9ea1281cc4b7e4c157fbeeea1.png

Description: DG monogram
As seen on: Unused Concept

Float? (Floaters: 39 )

Add to Pad (In 32 Pads )

Status: Nothing set
Viewed: 9931
Tags: green combination simple clean
Share:  

Lets Discuss

tishbite Nov. 17 '07

I have to find a use for this , it's very nice :)

Reply
0
Schwabe Nov. 17 '07

This concept is genius*

Reply
0
DR3AM Nov. 18 '07

omg :O I did an logotype just like that last week... It's gonna be used in a contest for my Graphical Design class... This was very wierd... :S

Reply
0
tishbite Nov. 18 '07

I think I ment YOU have to find a *use for it :)

Reply
0
firebrand Nov. 18 '07

Another nice letter combo, Kev. Good one!

Reply
0
rambal Nov. 18 '07

nice letter formation..

Reply
0
nido Nov. 18 '07

i see a toothbrush!

Reply
0
ChrisG Nov. 18 '07

If Dolce %26 Gabbana ever need a new logo.**http://eng.dolcegabbana.it/

Reply
0
ChrisG Nov. 18 '07

If %3Ca href%3D%22http://eng.dolcegabbana.it/%22%3EDolce %26 Gabbana%3C/a%3E ever need a new logo.**

Reply
0
raja Nov. 23 '07

you should keep nice marks like this under wraps if you know what I mean

Reply
0
OcularInk Nov. 23 '07

Well, if anyone wants it, they know where to find me. :-)

Reply
0
admarcbart Nov. 25 '07

Oc.. you and these damn unused icons. Man you should definately try and use them somewhere.

Reply
0
OcularInk Nov. 26 '07

I just gotta get better at convincing my clients. Haha...**Don't worry, this will get used at some point. :-D

Reply
0
andrendhiq Nov. 27 '07

Another cool letters combination.Great work.!

Reply
0
Denis Boss Jan. 01 '08

I tought it was new Dolce and Gabbana on the first look.*Great concept.

Reply
0
OcularInk Feb. 25 '08

Thanks to everyone and their feedback. How do I get in touch with Dolce and Gabbana? :-P

Reply
0
OcularInk Aug. 04 '08

Thanks tcheely. Anyone know how long that logo has been in use? I've never seen it before.

Reply
0
Naekie Aug. 04 '08

Pity they stole your idea OcularInk...damn...i hate it when that happens!!!*p.s D %26 G...are they like not in the book?

Reply
0
tcheely Aug. 04 '08

Calm down, this logo I made few weeks ago, but its non commercial, and this is for group (all grops have logo) on this website. And afkoz I didnt see your sign before. Just haphazard. Regards

Reply
0
OcularInk Aug. 05 '08

Hi tcheely, great minds must think alike. :-) I checked out your website, and you have a great collection of logos. However, because this is original content and I am the author and copyright holder, I advise you to please remove the logo ( immediately ) found here: http://www.digart.pl/grupy/1845/Graphic_design/*Use of copyright protected material without permission is illegal under copyright laws. Thanks for your quick attention and understanding.

Reply
0
saawan Aug. 05 '08

That group is Graphic Design i.e., GD and not DG so that logo isn't appropriate.

Reply
0
saawan Aug. 05 '08

As far as my knowledge goes, %22an eye starts looking at a picture from left.%22:http://www.useit.com/alertbox/reading_pattern.html The serifs suggest the D, first. If you want to see a G first, the rounded part of the G should be seen. Moreover as the D shape is dominant over G, anyone will first see a D before noticing the G.*Very less people read it as GD, comparitively.

Reply
0
dannygdammit Nov. 26 '08

Um, I think my name qualifies for this!

Reply
0
epsilon Nov. 26 '08

You absolutely need to show this to Dolce %26 Gabbana people. Their current logotype is nothing compared to this one :-) *

Reply
0
epsilon Nov. 26 '08

By the way, I think saawan is absolutely right .. at least for people with native language that reads left-to-right.

Reply
0
brandcore Dec. 15 '08

i really like this one!

Reply
0
OcularInk Dec. 16 '08

Interesting discussion, guys. And thanks for all the comments.

Reply
0
ace cream Oct. 02 '09

really really strong mark

Reply
0
OMNI Jan. 29 '10

I do not know if someone else already said this, the comments list is too long to check %3B-) but I saw this symbol and immediately thought %22Graphic Design%22. Right? Am I right? :D

Reply
0
OcularInk Jan. 29 '10

Etienne, welcome back! Actually, there was no direct intention when designing the symbol. Was just playing around. But now that you mention it...hmm.

Reply
0
nido Jan. 29 '10

not a bad idea for a blog... I think you should Kev...

Reply
0
OcularInk Jan. 29 '10

Thanks for the encouragement, nido. When I find the time, I'd love to!

Reply
0

Please login/signup to make a comment, registration is easy