Toadprintv2

by Logomotive • Uploaded: Aug. 07 '08 - Gallerized: Aug. '08

8e8051b220ec986820c11dc34da86284.png

Description: WIP.. another option,custom type.

Float? (Floaters: 20 )

Add to Pad (In 46 Pads )

Status: Nothing set
Viewed: 7386
Share:  

Lets Discuss

firebrand Aug. 07 '08

I remember when the front page was full of octopuses and seahorses...*Now it's toads!

Reply
0
firebrand Aug. 07 '08

He's cute. Nice colours and font choice BTW :)

Reply
0
Matheus Aug. 07 '08

nice typohgraphy. the toad is indeed cute

Reply
0
dache Aug. 07 '08

In the symbol the 'toad' is represented, but what about the 'print' aspect?

Reply
0
kriecheque Aug. 07 '08

maybe that's supposed to be the toads footPRINT above the i

Reply
0
dache Aug. 07 '08

If that is the case then the mark to the left may not be necessary as it is repetition.

Reply
0
Lawrence Anderson Aug. 07 '08

I do like the idea of removing the toad character, even if he is cute, just for the sake of simplicity.

Reply
0
daleharris Aug. 07 '08

Dache, whilst it is 'nice' and even perceived as %22clever%22 for a logo to represent everything about what a business does it is not actually it's purpose. A logo is a handy placeholder that builds recognition on multiple viewings, it represents the business or service in the mind of the viewer.. it is not a list of services or attributes. But I am sure that you understand that. **I would suggest either keeping the toad or the dots above the 'i' but not both.

Reply
0
logomotive Aug. 08 '08

Geeze why all the fuss? Frog stays, dots stay for me.I think it can work together or apart and that was my intention (mascot) I do appreciate your comments though.

Reply
0
OcularInk Aug. 08 '08

Memorable solution. I like the dots over the 'i'. The dots tie the mark and type together. To me, that's a bonus. And why does the %22print%22 aspect need to be included into the logo? Is that some sort of rule I'm not aware of?

Reply
0
neogrey Aug. 13 '08

clashmore, with THAT cartoony character it's MANDATORY to include the print somehow...otherwise, it looks like a toy shop or something like that.

Reply
0
logomotive Aug. 13 '08

IT says %22toadprint%22 unless someone cannot read I don't see a need to show any print aspect in the mark or mascot in this case, I can think of MANY logos that do not have things spelled out in the mark, in fact by the very same people making these comments. It's all good though :-)

Reply
0
gthobbs Aug. 13 '08

The way his hands are positioned with the light color on his chest, it looks like he's holding a piece of paper. There. There's your print angle.

Reply
0
graeme Aug. 23 '08

I think its really funny that everyone is talking about what the logo should be when we've all seen the logo and all know what it is.*Great job on the logo.*P.S. It looks to me like the frog is holding a piece of paper anyways (I know thats his tummy) Its a logo, we're not saving lives, I like it.

Reply
0
hindmarshdesign Aug. 27 '08

@ graeme: huh? which one is the logo?

Reply
0
graeme Sep. 18 '08

I believe the thing in the box at the top of the page is the logo. Are you not able to see it? It's the Toadprint logo I was referring to.

Reply
0
hindmarshdesign Sep. 18 '08

I thought it was just another option rather than the actual logo of the company....

Reply
0
graeme Sep. 19 '08

Well this is still a logo.*I don't know about the other ones, but I was just saying that I liked this one, so I posted the comment here.**Sorry if that was confusing.

Reply
0
jessicacrawford Sep. 19 '08

Personally I really like the frog but I agree that this logo might appear better without it.

Reply
0
logomotive Oct. 19 '09

LOL, I guess everyone wins. Client went with one of my other designs. :)

Reply
0

Please login/signup to make a comment, registration is easy