boots

by tarnishoar • Uploaded: Oct. 20 '10

30761058d8c4b124fb85c78dcf674f5c.png

Add to Pad (In 1 Pad )

Description: Can you spot the boot
Status: Just for fun
Viewed: 1323
Share:  

Lets Discuss

tarnishoar Oct. 20 '10

Thanks Joe for pointing that out. But I'm keeping this as I created this out of original inspiration :)

Reply
JoePrince Oct. 20 '10

So if I never saw the Nike swoosh logo before and created the same design out of inspiration then that's okay?

Reply
tarnishoar Oct. 20 '10

Well it's perfectly fine if deep inside you know you did it yourself. I, for one, would never have worked on it if I knew it was already done. It was a moment of sheer genius for me when I created it, but now, not so much as it has %22copy%22 written all over it :(. But I KNOW

Reply
JoePrince Oct. 20 '10

I'm not saying the concept isn't nice, just laying out a situation. Even if you like it I think you should consider removing it from the site seeing as it's already been done before.

Reply
tarnishoar Oct. 20 '10

Thanks Anthony. Yes it is Klavika.

Reply
alexander Oct. 20 '10

I read the comments, and on this one I can't make up my mind. Yes the concept has been done.**But many concepts have been done before and have been redone years later with success. Many marks use elements of others(concept wise).**It comes down to a few simple things, for me at least. How original was the first idea, how close are the two versions, and how long has it been since the first idea was used are all things I would take into account.**I'm not going to tell anyone to remove a mark, but I will say that Joe's Nike analogy really hit it home for me. Regardless of whether you had the great idea or somebody else did, the fact is the idea has already been done.**Sorry for the wall of text. Just found it an interesting issue. I'll close with the following%3B even though someone else did it too, doesn't mean it's not a great idea. %3D%5D.***

Reply
JoePrince Oct. 20 '10

%5EI agree, thanks Alexander. I'm not saying the concept is bad for the record. So that should not be misinterpreted. It's just been %22done%22 before. Anyway, cheers!

Reply
jorge Oct. 21 '10

In terms of looks, I like this one better.

Reply
noblehuman Oct. 21 '10

i agree with jorge, this one has a way better look.

Reply
ru_ferret Oct. 21 '10

%5EEven so the logo is good looking

Reply

Please login/signup to make a comment, registration is easy