Home

I love the color scheme, the type is interesting too!

This would make a good mark for *IncSpring*!

Always loved this!

I have to be honest and say I am dissapointed this logo made it into the gallery. I don't feel it meets the same standards of quality and design others have. No offense to the designer, it's merely my personal opinion.

Awesome logo.

I have to agree with Jedah but only because the vector points don't seem to have been very "tailored." If that makes any sense.... They seem a little rough.

@Climax - I think you phrased your point very well. It's one of those fine lines we walk as designers between making something look whimsical and free flowing or making it look like a chance happening.

Also I didn't notice until now this was work done in 2007. For a logo 5 year old, I retract some of my previous criticisms. In the end I think this logo has started a good dialog. Kudos.

@ all three - why does the splash need to be more 'tailored' exactly? Do we know the brief here? Just curious. I'm going to stick my neck on the line and say this looks the most professional out of all the current logos on the front page that I could expect to see in use in the real world.

Personally, the only element I think that lets the logo down is the radial gradient background used for the presentation. It looks great here: http://www.rogeroddone.com.br/Tvb perfect for it's intention, even 5 years later, IMO.

Rainbow gradient? That's all I have to say.

^^^

To be honest, I think shapes work here (Does anybody else see Macaw/Parrot feathers? Or perhaps a Karnival frock?) it's bursting with life & energy. The rainbow gradient is probably not something that I would do, at least in the same manner.

But I think if the shapes were all nice & neat or worked into an industrial grid or something (could be what Gareth was driving at, maybe?) I think it would kill off a lot of that energy.

"hahaha ima leave your neck out alone on that one ;) "

Good :)

I don't think any of us have an issue with the idea of the mark. The energy and burst elements certainly pop, but some of the sharp edges mixed with the overall feel looks like it was done by accident.

It doesn't feel designed with a purpose. This may be because I am familiar with Illustrator and tools such as the pucker and bloat. It feels like someone took a shape and applied a pucker tool resulting in this shape. The couple of sharps edges feels counterproductive to the energy, flow, and balance of the design.

It's a great idea executed with less than optimal results in my personal opinion.

"The couple of sharps edges feels counterproductive to the energy, flow, and balance of the design."

...and this is what I was trying to say. :)