by firebrand • Uploaded: Oct. 02 '07 - Gallerized: Oct. '07
Description:
A commercial and editorial photographer.
As seen on:
Status:
Client work
Viewed:
15674
Share:
Lets Discuss
I like this one a lot- perfect for a photographer.
ReplyGreat idea Roy, however it's off centered. jus kiddin.
ReplyI like a lot
ReplyLMFAO!
ReplySo this photographer focus is on roosters...OH!.. %3B)
Replythis is pretty cool tinged with some comical elements ... made me smile love it
Replylove it! simple and precise! i wish i would have thought of that! :)
ReplyThanks everyone. Neither the client or myself noticed this at the time. But she was very happy with it %3B)
ReplyAnother clever one!!
ReplyGreat idea :)))))))) Hmmmmm, roosters or something else.......? :)))))))) Hahahah :))
ReplyHey, Stefan, same think I thought of. : )
Reply%5E%5E %3B)
ReplyThis will rock for a male porn photographer :PPPPPPPP
Reply%5E (mysterious person) I only put it up because there was a lot of was 'ahem' talk on Monday. I did this a few years ago and I'm guessing the client's still happy with it as it's still in use.**In retrospect I should have switched the L's .**Probably have to red flag it at this rate %3B)
ReplyNice work, Roy. I'm a photographer and have been looking around for logo designers and found this site. How do I contact you to discuss creating a logo for me?
Replyoh, where did my name go? I'm the mysterious person - I'll take full credit for my comment. sorry about that - thought I was signed in...**never red flag 'em! you never know who will see it... perhaps a new client? (see @Alley Oop)
ReplySmart.
ReplyI just noticed 'COCK' in the viewfinder. Too bad.
Replydon't you guys get it?.. 'cock... %26 shoot'
Replyi like the concept, nice work!*I even agree with %3Cb%3Ebrandsimplicity%3C/b%3E *%3B ) just kiddin
ReplyAnother cracker Roy! But if you move it to the other 'L' it than becomes 'LCOCK'. L could stand for 'Large' or 'Lame'....my point is where will it end? No pun intended.
ReplyI like the approach, very simple,%0D*type is quite nice, however the focus on the word 'cock' is unfortunate.
ReplyI guess it comes down to personal preference because I personally do not think it as unfortunate. In this day and age, I think this 'accidental take' on the male organ is quite sassy. It gives the photographer almost a hidden image of doing something more daring than her competitors.
ReplyBRILLIANT! Great clean idea.
ReplyThanks people. Is it safe to come out now?
Replysmart logo for me, suit the business of the client. *nice job!
ReplyLove the concept!
Replycan't help but laugh at the idea that you're taking a photo of %22cock%22. i know, i'm a perv.
ReplyMaybe will I am the only one, but... even if the concept is great, like many in your showcase (the boat is one of my favorites!), there is something missing. I mean, when I saw it in between of all other marks in the gallery, it was the last that I want to click on... not because it is ugly (witch is not, otherwise I also clicked on it), but maybe because it looks too common and the concept was'nt clear enought in that way of view. So, it's my subjective opinion and the difficulty to explain that in english for me, is the reason why I only clicked on the anchor without comment.
Reply@absimile: Ok mate, thanks for your feedback.
ReplyAhem.
Replynice idea.I like the you used the frame.
Replynice idea.I like the way you used the frame.
ReplyThank you, tilboy.
ReplyAh man, I love this design (Must be having a slow day because I didn't even notice the little fubar) well done!
ReplyThanks Brian. What little fubar?
ReplyMy apologies - using the word 'fubar' was a bit too strong... perhaps I should refer to it as the %22cock-up%22 instead!! :-) but in all seriousness - a brilliant piece of design.
ReplyNo worries, only jesting. Thanks.
ReplyRule of thirds...**Nice design.
ReplyVery nice. I love the idea.
ReplyLovely concept.
ReplyThx.
ReplyPlease login/signup to make a comment, registration is easy