Very nice! The variation is more legible for me, but I like the look of both. By the way, have you tried all the letters on one line instead of a block. Just curious what that would look like.
Great type! I agree with Rokac, this reads LAVE, because I is the inly letter that doesn\'t have double stroke. But I also like connecting and hiding letters and it\'s not that easy to make an ambigram, so congrats on making nice solid ambigram!
Lets Discuss
Very nice! The variation is more legible for me, but I like the look of both. By the way, have you tried all the letters on one line instead of a block. Just curious what that would look like.
ReplyThanks Sam. I just added the side by side variation.
Replymassive type ... love it !!
ReplyI\'m a sucker for ambigrams!:)
ReplyGood work djredsky! Maybe you could emphasize the \"i\" even more...
Solid ambigram! I\'m with Roko about the \'i\'.
ReplyLove it.
ReplyFANTASTIC. Love the weight of it.
ReplyGreat type! I agree with Rokac, this reads LAVE, because I is the inly letter that doesn\'t have double stroke. But I also like connecting and hiding letters and it\'s not that easy to make an ambigram, so congrats on making nice solid ambigram!
ReplyPlease login/signup to make a comment, registration is easy