logoreview

by brandclay • Uploaded: Jan. 05 '09 - Gallerized: Jan. '09

a86b8cc823ce053e3762755360de687d.png

Add to Pad (In 110 Pad s )

Description: Thoughts everyone? I haven't sent it to the client yet, wanted to see what you guys thought. *updated kerning
As seen on: logoreview
Status: Nothing set
Viewed: 14692
Tags: review logo penflare
Share:  

Lets Discuss

grabbdesigns Jan. 05 '09

nice, simple and obvious - i like %3B)

Reply
sdijock Jan. 05 '09

Great logo. I know you've kept the space open to the left of the check mark because that's the space that the complete %22V%22 would have taken up. However, the hole it's creating is a little visually disruptive to the flow of the logo. Nice regardless.

Reply
OcularInk Jan. 05 '09

Hmm, I kind of think the 'V' is where it should be. The negative space there helps reinforce the idea that the check mark was formed by the V. If the V is moved closer, legibility could be sacrificed. You have a point though, Steve (sdijock).

Reply
sdijock Jan. 05 '09

I personally prefer the updated kerning, but I think it's an incredible logo either way.

Reply
gyui Jan. 05 '09

i think it's great penflare, wouldn't change a thing on this version.

Reply
epsilon Jan. 05 '09

Kerning between E and V is too tight. Also Logo type looks thinner than Review part, not sure if it's intentional.**Very nice otherwise. Simple is the best.

Reply
lundeja Jan. 05 '09

I don't know what it is about this one, but I really enjoy it.

Reply
penflare Jan. 05 '09

i kerned it that way so the spacing would be the same from where the %22check%22 is cut off next to the %22e%22 to the top of the %22check%22 by the %22i%22

Reply
penflare Jan. 05 '09

and its all the same weight

Reply
epsilon Jan. 05 '09

I figured it must've been the same weight. Typically the dark-on-light type needs more weight to look the same as light-on-dark version. I just wasn't sure if you _wanted_ Logo to look thinner.**Re: kerning, I'd try pushing the checkmark to the right halfway to V's original position. It does look a bit cluttered to me right now, and I can see how the original kerning could've been too generous.

Reply
Kode Jan. 06 '09

Very nice logo Sean!

Reply
crislabno Jan. 06 '09

penflare , you definately should stop doing this.

Reply
jsae Jan. 06 '09

nice and to the point, cheers!

Reply
Autoanswer Jan. 06 '09

I would add a few volume. But in general it is good

Reply
maximalist Jan. 06 '09

very nice idea, clever and clean %3B-)

Reply
OcularInk Jan. 07 '09

Looking good, Sean. Nice color update too.

Reply
penflare Jan. 07 '09

thanks everyone. client loved it

Reply
Siah-Design Jan. 08 '09

Hey Sean, thats awesome. VERY NICE. :)

Reply
alto Jan. 09 '09

Very nice, clean and simple. Happy the client loved it :)

Reply
Koma Jan. 23 '09

lightweight at it's best :)

Reply
designabot May. 10 '09

I made a similar logo with the check mark V a few years back...*but none the less this looks superb!

Reply
MomentumMagazine May. 30 '09

This is a very cool and clean idea!

Reply
ndmgfx Dec. 06 '09

one of the best simplistic logos with a smart twist.*

Reply

Please login/signup to make a comment, registration is easy