Home

logoreview

by brandclay • Uploaded: Jan. 05 '09 - Gallerized: Jan. '09

a86b8cc823ce053e3762755360de687d.png

Description: Thoughts everyone? I haven't sent it to the client yet, wanted to see what you guys thought.

*updated kerning
As seen on: logoreview

Float? (Floaters: 77 )

Add to Pad (In 110 Pads )

Status: Nothing set
Viewed: 13765
Tags: review logo penflare
Share:

Lets Discuss

grabbdesigns Jan. 05 '09

nice, simple and obvious - i like ;)

Reply
0
sdijock Jan. 05 '09

Great logo. I know you've kept the space open to the left of the check mark because that's the space that the complete "V" would have taken up. However, the hole it's creating is a little visually disruptive to the flow of the logo. Nice regardless.

Reply
0
OcularInk Jan. 05 '09

Hmm, I kind of think the 'V' is where it should be. The negative space there helps reinforce the idea that the check mark was formed by the V. If the V is moved closer, legibility could be sacrificed. You have a point though, Steve (sdijock).

Reply
0
sdijock Jan. 05 '09

I personally prefer the updated kerning, but I think it's an incredible logo either way.

Reply
0
gyui Jan. 05 '09

i think it's great penflare, wouldn't change a thing on this version.

Reply
0
epsilon Jan. 05 '09

Kerning between E and V is too tight. Also Logo type looks thinner than Review part, not sure if it's intentional.

Very nice otherwise. Simple is the best.

Reply
0
lundeja Jan. 05 '09

I don't know what it is about this one, but I really enjoy it.

Reply
0
penflare Jan. 05 '09

i kerned it that way so the spacing would be the same from where the "check" is cut off next to the "e" to the top of the "check" by the "i"

Reply
0
penflare Jan. 05 '09

and its all the same weight

Reply
0
epsilon Jan. 05 '09

I figured it must've been the same weight. Typically the dark-on-light type needs more weight to look the same as light-on-dark version. I just wasn't sure if you _wanted_ Logo to look thinner.

Re: kerning, I'd try pushing the checkmark to the right halfway to V's original position. It does look a bit cluttered to me right now, and I can see how the original kerning could've been too generous.

Reply
0
Kode Jan. 06 '09

Very nice logo Sean!

Reply
0
crislabno Jan. 06 '09

penflare , you definately should stop doing this.

Reply
0
jsae Jan. 06 '09

nice and to the point, cheers!

Reply
0
Autoanswer Jan. 06 '09

I would add a few volume. But in general it is good

Reply
0
maximalist Jan. 06 '09

very nice idea, clever and clean ;-)

Reply
0
OcularInk Jan. 07 '09

Looking good, Sean. Nice color update too.

Reply
0
penflare Jan. 07 '09

thanks everyone. client loved it

Reply
0
Siah-Design Jan. 08 '09

Hey Sean, thats awesome. VERY NICE. :)

Reply
0
alto Jan. 09 '09

Very nice, clean and simple. Happy the client loved it :)

Reply
0
Koma Jan. 23 '09

lightweight at it's best :)

Reply
0
designabot May. 10 '09

I made a similar logo with the check mark V a few years back...
but none the less this looks superb!

Reply
0
MomentumMagazine May. 30 '09

This is a very cool and clean idea!

Reply
0
ndmgfx Dec. 06 '09

one of the best simplistic logos with a smart twist.

Reply
0

Please login/signup to make a comment, registration is easy