critical

by bartodell • Uploaded: Dec. 12 '07 - Gallerized: Dec. '07

545de70ab1d8340012a224e176c30f7f.png

Add to Pad (In 51 Pad s )

Description: Additional information will be given at a later time.
Status: Nothing set
Viewed: 9479
Share:  

Lets Discuss

daleharris Dec. 12 '07

Hey Bart, this is stunning man. I feel like I should try and be super-critical just because of the name. I don't think you need to do anything more but I wonder how a little highlight just on the top right edge of the black c might look. I love it. Avenir is the king.

Reply
alto Dec. 12 '07

Very cool! Added to my favs.

Reply
OcularInk Dec. 13 '07

At first I thought this was a Raja creation. Way to break out of your style, Bartster!! Wish I could do that more. :-) This one came out great!

Reply
Art Machine Dec. 13 '07

Really great work Bart!

Reply
admarcbart Dec. 13 '07

Thanks for the compliments guys. I am very proud of this one.*@ Dale, I tried that somewhat in the beginning, it did not seem to look right.*@ Alto, thanks man.*@ Doc, HAHA, When I grow up I want to be just like Raja and you!*@ Art, Thanks a bunch.*@ Smartinup, well...... you will have to wait and see. %3B)

Reply
firebrand Dec. 13 '07

This is great. Love the type too, Bart.

Reply
logomotive Dec. 13 '07

Very pretty Bart and nice execution.

Reply
admarcbart Dec. 13 '07

Thanks Train Guys!!!! LOL :)

Reply
dache Dec. 21 '07

I have seen this style of logo and this type treatment before%3B I question its reason for being in the gallery. Nothing against the work itself.

Reply
admarcbart Dec. 21 '07

Dache... if you have a problem with David's choices for the gallery, take it up with him. Very professional of you to challenge his rationale within the logo comments section of the site rather than the forums.

Reply
dache Dec. 22 '07

No problem at all, just wondering. Dont take it badly :%5E)

Reply
OcularInk Dec. 22 '07

@ dache: Is the logo good enough for the gallery? If so, what does it even matter? While you say you've seen this 'style' of logo before, it's not a common 'style' in Bart's showcase. So, in my opinion, a well deserved gallery feature to show the designer's true capabilitites as a logo designer. Honestly, from my perspective, it sounds like someone is jealous...or bitter. But that's just my perspective. What do I know?%0D*%0D*HAPPY HOLIDAYS!!%0D*%0D*

Reply
dache Dec. 23 '07

Yes, I think it should be in the gallery but that is a personal opinion. It is the constantly evolving platform of assessment per member which I question.*Your analysis of the question is incorrect and out of line.

Reply
Hayes Image Dec. 23 '07

Allot of the guys on this site can give criticism well %26 receive criticism well...You Dache, can give criticism well, but receive it well? Nope...**What does %26 doesn't get added to the gallery is completely out of Bart's hands...**I'd add this logo to the gallery.

Reply
dache Dec. 23 '07

Welcome to the clique Hayes :%5E)

Reply
Hayes Image Dec. 23 '07

Yeah, no worries man :) Merry Xmas!!

Reply
brandsimplicity Dec. 23 '07

Bart this is very cool and who really cares if it works on faxes or not.

Reply
Hayes Image Dec. 23 '07

sigh...you see someone post some aggressive %26 condescending statements, you try to back their 'better' statements, you try to compliment their work, but it's not until you confront them directly (in a negative way) before they give you they give you time of day...**Now they go red flag design work that gets mixed reviews, so nobody else can comment on it...**What is your angle Dache?**Is it fear, egotism, or someting else?

Reply
brandsimplicity Dec. 23 '07

Hayes,your playing right into his hands.

Reply
bpotstra Dec. 23 '07

Seriously guys, grow up.

Reply
ocularink Dec. 23 '07

Yea, Brian's right. No more arguing. My apologies, Dache. Glad this made it to the gallery, Bart.%0D*%0D*Cheer's everyone!!

Reply
firebrand Dec. 23 '07

Yea come on everyone. 'Tis the season to be jolly!

Reply
Hayes Image Dec. 23 '07

@brandsimplisity, you know what, I think you're right...it ain't worth it

Reply
MikePearce Dec. 26 '07

How does this logo work on white?

Reply
logomotive Dec. 26 '07

@MikePearce,*Any decent designer can look at this and see that it will work just as well on a %22white%22 background as it does here, In fact any decent designer can look at a well designed logo on a dark background and figure out how it can be reversed and work just as well. There is not a set standard on the way a logo should presented, the standard is that it should work both ways. While it is true that most printed published works of logos are on white, this is the internet and we are dealing with translucent light, so why not get the most out of a presentation, to each their own.

Reply
MikePearce Dec. 27 '07

So is it fair to imply you're saying I'm not a %22decent%22 designer then? this site has more beef than an Arbys. geek rage

Reply
bpotstra Dec. 27 '07

Yikes! Logomotive, simmer down buddy, it was a simple question. Why not let the author of the logo answer it?

Reply
OcularInk Dec. 27 '07

@ MikePearce : Lol!! It sounds like logomotive is implying that you are a 'decent' designer (for lack of better words) and should be able to imagine what this logo would look like on a white background.**Even so, if the brand/identity calls for a black background, what should it matter? It's part of the brand, therefore, a part of the presentation. Just my two cents. :-)

Reply
logomotive Dec. 27 '07

@ Mike it was a general statement as stated in my other post. I can see that you are above decent,sorry if you felt I was directing at you. No tone of voice and it was just a simple answer. I'm spontaneous sometimes.

Reply
admarcbart Dec. 27 '07

@ MikePearce, works just fine. You need not worry about these things. :) To everything there is a purpose, some of which not everyone will understand. Now please take your comments somewhere else, say the forums? That is what they are for if I am not mistaken. :)**@ Doc Oc, Logomotive, BPotstra, thanks for all of the comments.**No need to let this get out of hand in here. Not saying that it did. However, I am tired of reading everyone else's little unimportant comments on EVERYONE's work. Not just my own.**This site was built to be a showcase of work. Not a showcase of ignorance in the field of art or design.

Reply
nido Dec. 27 '07

yes i agree with Bart.. my congratulations on this wonderful logo bub...**So how does it look on green %3B)

Reply
Hayes Image Dec. 27 '07

Yeah Bart I agree too, sometimes our ego's get out of hand...**It is a great logo, congrats :)

Reply
admarcbart Dec. 27 '07

Hayes.. thanks man. The above was not directed in anyone in particular. Just me venting in MY OWN posting in MY OWN USER GALLERY, not someone elses.

Reply
ahab Dec. 28 '07

This logo sucks and you are all crazy ego maniacs!!!!

Reply
ahab Dec. 28 '07

JUST KIDDING! I thought I would drop a silly line to show you all how funny this all is.**Nice logo Bart.**@ OC: this is totally different then most of Bart's work and I really appreciate the fact that this site notices each individual arist and thier styles.**I love it!

Reply
OcularInk Dec. 28 '07

@ ahab : My point exactly. Cheers!!**%3C----Biggest EGO of them all. :-P

Reply
MoonboxDesign Jan. 11 '08

Excellent work Bart! Love it. Very unique. I wouldn't change a thing.*Looks great just like it is. Keep up the great work man.

Reply
admarcbart Jan. 15 '08

Thanks MoonBox! I appreciate it. Nice showcase BTW.

Reply
raja Feb. 06 '08

%22Honestly, from my perspective, it sounds like someone is jealous...or bitter. But that's just my perspective. What do I know?%22**A lot!**Awesome logo Bart.

Reply
bartodell Sep. 04 '08

Selected for LogoLounge Volume 5!

Reply
raja Sep. 05 '08

hey that is great news, and well deserved!

Reply
mabu Jul. 06 '10

I love the mark. Excellent work Bart.

Reply

Please login/signup to make a comment, registration is easy