Proof that acusador would rather not use his real identity.*I could probably point to 100s of logos/illustrations with a similar line technique for the female brow/nose. IMO this is not a conflict.
Now this just got very interesting as far as I am concerned (this is Dale btw %3B) ). I have just done a bit of research myself into our La Bella logo and what proof is out there on the web as to how long ago it was designed, and whilst I do not have any proof besides my own word that this was designed well before the August 10th 2008 date given on the other logo (the original concepts for this logo were presented to the client on the 15th of April 2008), I do however have proof that an early version of it was listed on a number of sites prior to August 10th 2008, including well known logo inspiration websites including Creattica.com (then faveup.com), Logosauce, Behance.net and of course Logopond on the 9th of August. (the ones I could find URLs for are listed below)**http://www.identityarchives.com/detail.php?id%3D1142*http://www.designerid.com/portfolio.php?id%3D11016*http://www.logosauce.com/logos/27761*http://creattica.com/logos/la-bella/5451*http://www.behance.net/Gallery/La-Bella/115458**I personally find the fact that our logo was listed on all these sites and then a day later a similar logo was uploaded to Logopond VERY interesting.
Lets Discuss
Ridiculous.
ReplyLP piece imo.
Replyisnt this stolen?
Replyhes trying to prove a point...a ridiculous point if you ask me...**http://logopond.com/gallery/detail/69020
ReplyCan you explain what this is for the people that have no clue what you mean? Including myself. %22proof%22 doesn't really explain much!
ReplyProof that acusador would rather not use his real identity.*I could probably point to 100s of logos/illustrations with a similar line technique for the female brow/nose. IMO this is not a conflict.
Replywtf?
ReplyNow this just got very interesting as far as I am concerned (this is Dale btw %3B) ). I have just done a bit of research myself into our La Bella logo and what proof is out there on the web as to how long ago it was designed, and whilst I do not have any proof besides my own word that this was designed well before the August 10th 2008 date given on the other logo (the original concepts for this logo were presented to the client on the 15th of April 2008), I do however have proof that an early version of it was listed on a number of sites prior to August 10th 2008, including well known logo inspiration websites including Creattica.com (then faveup.com), Logosauce, Behance.net and of course Logopond on the 9th of August. (the ones I could find URLs for are listed below)**http://www.identityarchives.com/detail.php?id%3D1142*http://www.designerid.com/portfolio.php?id%3D11016*http://www.logosauce.com/logos/27761*http://creattica.com/logos/la-bella/5451*http://www.behance.net/Gallery/La-Bella/115458**I personally find the fact that our logo was listed on all these sites and then a day later a similar logo was uploaded to Logopond VERY interesting.
ReplyThank you for clearing that up, Dale. It's a shame that a designer of your integrity has to defend his work.
ReplyPlease login/signup to make a comment, registration is easy