DeVide

by Swader • Uploaded: Jan. 14 '10

e829fdbf46e6ac866a59b02b4126a3b3.png

Add to Pad (In 2 Pad s )

Description: Work in progress. Inspired by the wonderful work of Mr. David Pache.
As seen on: -
Status: Unused proposal
Viewed: 1835
Tags: powerful effective simple modern
Share:  

Lets Discuss

epsilon Jan. 14 '10

A bit too busy for my taste

Reply
logomotive Jan. 14 '10

No type? only geometrical symbol. Yep

Reply
logomotive Jan. 14 '10

A large part of %22logo design%22 is typography.

Reply
eziemac Jan. 14 '10

I know simplicity is a good thing in many cases but come on!

Reply
epsilon Jan. 14 '10

@logomotive - that's a backslash, this _is_ a typo-only logo. duh :-)

Reply
mfrank Jan. 14 '10

I personally would have gone with the forward slash. %3B)

Reply
logomotive Jan. 14 '10

%5E%5E%5E ha give me a %7C

Reply
j-CAZ Jan. 15 '10

I don't know about everyone else, but I see a 2D side view of what may very well be the greatest logo ever designed by a human being on earth. . . ever.

Reply
nido Jan. 15 '10

nice ambigram...

Reply
logoboom Jan. 15 '10

I don't like the color.

Reply
ethereal Jan. 15 '10

%5E EXACTLY! Blue is the clear choice here.

Reply
Swader Jan. 16 '10

Don't worry, this is not a fake account. It's my one and only account, with which I did not break any rules. If you can quote a single broken rule, I will happily make a public apology. If you cannot, I will expect one from you, for unjustly removing a design.

Reply
logomotive Jan. 16 '10

So is it Swader or Persuader? just going by your name and email. What's the point here?

Reply
Swader Jan. 17 '10

Either way is fine.*If I went and explained the point into details, I'm sure I would break a rule or two. But as it is, I can see quite a few people got the gist, and many more I'm sure, not commenting.

Reply
logoboom Jan. 17 '10

%3C%3C%3C confused and done.

Reply
Swader Jan. 18 '10

I apologize, I should have red flagged everything. Might have made the gallery that way, even :)**Just kidding. I simply wanted to see people's thoughts, never intended them to bash him through this design's comments.**But is it not curious that he, a veteran designer supposedly respected by everyone around, had to start red flagging because of %22issues%22? What I wanted to point out with posting a spoof design such as this one is that quality is no longer appreciated, even in semi-professional communities such as this one. It's all about sucking up to the big players, many of whom got big accidentally, and have no real current value other than click revenue.**You're right, I have been following the site. I just haven't been a member. I've been told about his spam flood of random geometric random colored shapes by a couple designers in another community, and what I saw in his showcase when I came to see it in person was even worse. The fact that google Ads money keeps coming in because he has many clicks, and that he has many clicks because he mass produces random objects is beside the point, it is the image of this community and the quality it was supposed to represent that has been shattered and violated.**That said, I'll bother you no more. I apologize for the crude sarcasm and commotion I've created (though one could be curious why a commotion could develop in the first place, if I'm so wrong). I'll delete my account and retire back to my roots.**Thanks to all the swimmers %3B)*Many greetings

Reply
mfrank Jan. 18 '10

I'm not even really sure what his point is...

Reply
logomotive Jan. 18 '10

freedom of speech I guess?

Reply
nido Jan. 21 '10

%5EI was just about to write the same thing... got half way and all...

Reply

Please login/signup to make a comment, registration is easy