Jul. 17 '10
Add to Pad
4 Pads )
nice mark. i like it.
this is nice as well..
Thanks for the input guys!
I love the mark, would work on type a bit, but probably just me :)
yep ... really nice work
Very nicely executed, but the concept belongs to Unilever as I'm sure you know.
No I dont. Its not a concept epsilon... its a style. I think you should look at history of logos to know that there were many brands who have used this styling long before uniliver. And many designers on this forum and others have used this styling in many logos. They are not taking concepts from uniliver...but simply folling a design style. See some examples...%0D*http://logopond.com/gallery/detail/96986%0D*http://logopond.com/gallery/detail/112033%0D*http://logopond.com/gallery/detail/75587%0D*http://logopond.com/gallery/detail/107981%0D*http://logopond.com/gallery/detail/84276%0D*http://logopond.com/gallery/detail/19938%0D*
%22Belongs%22 in a common sense, not that they invented it. Unilever's is the most widely seen logo done in this style. It's on my toothpaste for chrissake. So whenever another logo surfaces that is done in the same vein it will inevitably be compared to Unilever's. That's all.
offcourse... you have a right to say that if you come on this forum to make a comment as a toothpaste consumer. But if your comments should be considered utterance of a professional designer or brand solutionist then you should reconsider what you say.%0D*%0D*Thanks
I agree with Noetic Brands ... its a style ... otherwise no more circles (luky strike) no more squares (Deutsche Bank) and no more red, green, yellow ... no ... no ... look at the unilever logo ... imo it's totally different
Cheers Type and Signs!
Please login/signup to make a comment, registration is easy