LogoPond

@forga Thanks for the heads up. Bucks before backbone for some it seems! :-(

@mcguire I'm not a paying member of logolounge. Can you or anyone else see a timestamp for these logos?

@mcguire Thanks. I had no idea. :(

@muse7 I usually try to avoid Internet conflict but I fail to see how you have the audacity to make such a claim. This has now evolved into a matter of principle.

You clearly took an existing design of yours (the camera) and hastily formed it into cheese, added a speech bubble, similar brand name and even the same color background to your design. You were essentially trying to sell the same image of yours (the camera) twice on Brandstack (an immorality in itself - which someone else happened to point out in the comments for your logo) in a quick hasty move for a sell a similar concept after viewing the positive feedback for this design on Logopond. We can see this by the fact that the quality of the logo was very poor, whilst the remainder of your work is of a high standard. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind this is the very move you made.

As for "threats" you were sent a polite message as soon as your work was brought to our attention when the work was assumed to be 100% original. As highlighted we are now aware that there happens to be many similar designs created in the past and I'm sure there will be more to come - which won't raise such conflicts. The difference in this case however is your clear lack of moral fiber in the fact that you are now going as far to try and push the suggestion that the work (and comments) herein weren't the clear inspiration for you to make such a hasty move. For that reason alone I concur that it is a very sad day indeed - at least on your part.