Home

Underrated!

@etherael - Ha! Right?! %3B) ... :) Thanks very much for the comment! Cheers!

How does this exudes luxury?

I love everything except the chocolate lettering, but as with Mister Jones I'm also not convinced of the luxury connotation. Looks kinda retro I guess.

Alright...Alright... %3B) I've made some minor edits appease the masses... :)*@mister jones - I do appreciate your comment, however you haven't said much about the actual work vs. the copy... In a way I kind of agree with you guys on the Luxury point if you're talking modern day Teuscher and Godiva etc. However, drawing significant inspiration from vintage food branding %26 adverts of early 1900s...for that period, and the 'feel' I'm trying to convey with this brand, I believe the 'so called luxury' aspect in fact holds true... As for the 'retro' description, I suppose we could go with 'vintage' instead, though there's probably a touch of retro in there as well. %3B)*@cerise - Thanks for the comment! The 'Chocolate' lettering was switched around a few times during development, but I think I've settled on this version for the time being... It's still a potential work in progress though so there's always room for improvement!*Thanks again to both of you for stopping by!

mmmm... Godiva :)*thanks for replying, I was just wondering how you saw this.*My main comment on this logo would be the integration of %22chocolate%22, doesn't really work for me, it kind of overpowers the other elements. I do like the typography of %22blink%22. I'd settle for a more-is-less approach here.

@mister jones - I definitely get what you're saying with the 'less-is-more' thing %3B) Maybe when I have a minute, I can post up a couple variations and you can give me your thoughts :) Appreciate the follow up!

hey would love to see blink on its own, great piece of typography

@mcdseven - Thanks a lot Paul!*%5EOf course, that can easily be arranged... %3B)

@AlenAdvertising - Cheers! Thanks very much!

@%E7ocuk oyunlari - Thanks a lot! Much appreciated!