-
I am actively looking for critiques
- Metro Turf
- by bartodell
- Lawn and landcare company logo in a major metropolitan area.
- Number of views: 3360
- Dated Submitted: Oct. 25 '06
- Added to Gallery: Jan. 14 '08
Oct. 31 '06
CreativeGuy said:I like it. In my opinion, it\'s \"lacking\" in some area, but I can\'t quite put my finger on it. I like the M and T being separate in the mark, maybe it\'s the font choice? I dunno.
Nov. 01 '06
OcularInk said:I think you have a nice logo going on here. However, I\'m wondering how the mark would look without the black box around it and \'Metro Turf\' changed to all black.
-Kevin
Jan. 15 '08
drewboy said:Sorry Bart, but I saw ITI as well. There's something strangely sexual about the mark as well... although maybe that's just me??
Jan. 15 '08
artboy said:Gotta admit I agree, I saw ITI first - only looking at the first comment made me look at the name and realise it should be an 'M'. I also think 'Metroturf' is a bit too close to the mark.
Jan. 15 '08
onesummer said:yeah, I read ITI first, too, sorry. and I don't care for the extras (like the highlight on the T in the mark). I think this would look so much better if you loose the gradients, and leave it in a one or two flat color version.
Jan. 15 '08
hoshi6 said:Oh man, I love it...the only things...and this is constructive criticism, as was previously mentioned, It's a bit harder to see an "M"...i see the "T" right away though. Also I think it would look great if instead of just a black rectangle around the icon itself, maybe it would look good with the black rectangle around all of it, that way the name itself stands out too.
Jan. 23 '08
leighton_hubbell said:Seems to be a whole lot of 'over-noodling' I think. It's a strong mark as is. I'm not sure I would change a thing. Nice work.
May. 01 '08
kellyoneill said:I agree with Ocularink on the box.. It may look even cleaner without it - I love this logo.
Please login/register to make a comment, registration is easy, signup
Oct. 25 '06
jwadenpfuhl said:I like this alot. The \"t\" really stands out alot more than the \"m\". Maybe try joining the ends of the \"t\" to the two side parts of the \"m\" so it\'s all one piece - still keeping the \"t\" a different shade...?