advertisment

d.construct

by 38one • Uploaded: Oct. 03 '06
Gallerized Oct. '06 e99eabaf4836a19f7c29b0c99337464a.png
8949

Description: d.Construct is dedicated to those building the latest generation of web-based applications, and topics such as Ajax, using the power of APIs and the future mobile web.

As seen on: d.Construct

Status: Nothing set

Commenting: Not seeking critique, comments fine

More from this user:

unstructure said on Oct. 03 '06

I always liked this logo

pungsveittur said on Oct. 04 '06

Nice to see some gradients and drop shadows used on logos.. finally!
782

OcularInk said on Oct. 04 '06

I like your concept, but I think this logo could have been executed more effectively. The perspective on the box seems off and it\'s hard to make out \"d.construct\". Just doesn\'t read well. -Kevin
908

bpotstra said on Oct. 04 '06

I love this! excellent realism to the rendering of both the unfolded cube and also the typeface. Stellar!

yo said on Oct. 04 '06

I like this logo. It seems to me that the picture and construct is tied each other.

spasquini said on Oct. 05 '06

I\'m against the gradients and shadows on logos, and also the fact that they are builded with 3D images. The combination between the complicated appeareance of d.construct and the open box is also lowering the vote.

RUDEWORKS said on Oct. 05 '06

Beautiful.
452

zwoelf said on Oct. 05 '06

The main idea is great, i would possibly try with a wider \"ribbon\" aswell. I think this logo would only work in larger sizes. It doesnt working in this size, how dou you think will work in smaller?
271

grubedoo said on Oct. 06 '06

The icon and lettermark treatment detract from each other. They are too far apart stylistically and when combined there is too much going on in the logo. The folded paper letter-form is a great idea, but as it is, it doesn\'t read very well. Fine-tuned a bit it could stand by itself. The unfolded box is a good idea as well but would be better matched with a simple [san-serif] font. This could work as a seperate icon for d.construct.

tok69 said on Oct. 07 '06

I like the open box icon. The font (type treatment) doesnt work well. It seems to look \"OK\" when it is shown at a larger scale but when reduced it will not show the shadows of each fold. Also at the size you have it here its really hard to notice those are shadows then lines. other than that good work. best, Tom

travisL said on Oct. 14 '06

I like it... and yes while it may lose legibility significantly when it is downsized, why not convert the type to simple flat vector paths in smaller-type applications?? However.. I dont get an \"s\" out of the character after the \"n\"
2474

shaneg said on Oct. 18 '06

The typography and font is freakin awesome. Great job, the box, and the type treatment visually communicate deconstruction.

doodler said on Nov. 03 '06

I like this. I think the typography is brilliant/unique enough to stand on its own though... perhaps the box is overkill?

Jormi_Boced said on Mar. 05 '07

I like the idea, but it is way to busy and the gradients and drop shadows are too much.

Web Design Wales said on Mar. 19 '07

Far too many folds, too much going on. It's a nice concept but it doesn't work in practice

Please login/register to make a comment, registration is easy,

Logopond Book V1 - PreSale Now!