• Don't mind critiques, but I'm not actively looking for them
Q Photography
by wolv
Elegant Q for wedding photographer. a Q ring (update no sparkle)
Number of views: 5928
Dated Submitted: Sep. 27 '07
Added to Gallery: Oct. 27 '07

Sep. 27 '07

90degrees90 said:

I really like the overall look! Suggestions:- Take out the 2 glare elements in the Q (they aren't serving any purpose), possibly make the leg of the 'Q' thinner, it looks too thick! I might centre the text below the 'cirlce' shape also.

Really nice logo!


Sep. 27 '07

ryantoyota said:

This is beautiful. I kind of agree with 90degrees90 on the sparkles... unless they serve a special purpose. Everything else I think is perfect, including the alignment of the text. I absolutely love the triple meaning of the symbol. Perfectly executed!


Sep. 28 '07

firebrand said:

Great symbol and typography but doesn't need the effects.


Sep. 28 '07

design_uk said:

nice overall, no need for the extra sparkles etc.
The shadow looks a little odd, does it need it?


Sep. 28 '07

nido said:

im liking this too.. & i kinda like the sparkles...


Sep. 29 '07

flipside said:

Very elegant... I also agree, the sparkles are a nice touch but a little distracting from the overall feel of the design


Oct. 01 '07

wolv said:

wow, i didn'nt expect such comments. thank you all, all the inputs are very valuable and i mean this is my first real client. thank you very much all :)

i think the sparkle is cool, i mean it's a wedding photographer and in my vision a wedding is something beautiful with sparkly thing like magic. and not much logo have a sparkle effect in it. you're right about the shadow, a little odd, i think i can take them out.
thanks all


Oct. 08 '07

chazthetic said:

Nice!
I agree, I don't like the sparkle either, but the concept and execution of everything else is great.


Oct. 09 '07

erikatwebologist said:

While I think the sparkles add a unique touch to it, something about them seems out of place. Could you try playing around with them and trying different looks? If you don't think you can change the sparkles I would honestly leave them in; they set this logo apart from the rest. I think this concept is wonderful.


Oct. 09 '07

erikatwebologist said:

P.S. I also think the gloss really adds to it.


Oct. 27 '07

wolv said:

thanks erik,.. updated


Oct. 27 '07

ahab said:

In the word's of the great Borat..."VERY NIIICE!"


Oct. 27 '07

firebrand said:

I love this mark even more without the sparkles. A camera lense, ring, Q, P and yet so damn simple!


Oct. 27 '07

ryantoyota said:

Firebrand, you missed the film roll!


Oct. 27 '07

firebrand said:

Haha, so I did!


Oct. 27 '07

OcularInk said:

So many hidden secrets. Sweet!!


Oct. 27 '07

wolv said:

Hey, this up again :) thank you guys, i didn't notice there were so many secrets .. lol :) it was intended to be a Q ring, but an extra is always a good thing :)


Oct. 28 '07

icu said:

I like it a lot. You have done a great work.

But text under Q should be centered. The rest is just perfect


Oct. 28 '07

wheedwacker said:

doesnt look like a Q but it looks great anyways


Oct. 28 '07

wolv said:

@icu: it does centered, with the tail altogether.

@wheedwacker: it has all the features of the letter Q

thanks for the comments :)


Oct. 28 '07

sandhya said:

Elegant!


Oct. 29 '07

moverdrive said:

Gorgeous mark. I like the odd balance. Really nice.


Nov. 12 '07

ryantoyota said:

Wait... so the film roll wasn't intentional? That's the first thing I saw, and I thought it was the most brilliant representation of a film roll that I've ever seen.


Nov. 26 '07

wolv said:

hehe, it's not intentional :)


Dec. 13 '07

gbo said:

Nice logo & I like the sparkle. Nice logo.


Please login/register to make a comment, registration is easy, signup