-
I am actively looking for critiques
- Curious
- by actiondesigner
- Originally intended for curious.no Featured in Logo Lounge 4.
- Number of views: 1433
- Dated Submitted: May. 28 '07
- Added to Gallery: May. 06 '08
Jun. 04 '07
burn creative said:Is this associated with Curious Pictures? Are they changing their name?
Jun. 04 '07
actiondesigner said:No ...this was a proposed logo for http://www.curious.no but they allready had extensive branding for them to use this one instead. I have no knowledge of what curiouspictures is. And I see that they have a questionmark instead of a P.
May. 08 '08
redfour said:Really nice, simple and very, very effective.
May. 08 '08
actiondesigner said:Thanks all for your comments;)
@cfig
Did you sink my logo because you THINK or believe I rippet of their logo? Im from Norway. I got my logo in logolounge by being evaluated by Louis Lygo of Wolff Olins, Jerry Kuyper of Jerry Kuyper Partners, Jason Schulte of Office, Gaby de Abreu of Switch Branding & Design, Haley Johnson of Haley Johnson Design, Neville Brody of Research Studios, Janet Martin of Communication Arts, Inc., and Chris Campbell of Interbrand. Dont you think they would have noticed this?
By sinking you are calling me a liar and I cant have that.
curious.no is a norwegian company. I solve many of my logos with concepts like this.
May. 08 '08
cfig said:no, I don't think it was intentional...just that it's very reminiscent of the work. It's very possible you never saw the other mark. As I have seen a similar idea before, however, this doesn't strike me as particularly original. Am I not allowed to not particularly like something for my own reasons? You might also message me to discuss something like this rather than call me out in public, would be a bit more professional.
I'm very happy you got your work into LogoLouge, congrats. Personally, I find the books to be a bit hit or miss, however, while some work included is rather strong I'm very surprised at some of the work that does get included. Yours is better than most, in any case.
May. 08 '08
actiondesigner said:Just that you first implied ...then sunk it! Dont have any problems with you not liking it. Believe me:) And If you sunk it without any comment I wouldnt mind. Nice to get the reason behind it.
My point with logolounge wasnt "The logo has to be great. Its in Logolounge" Just wanted to point out that the judges combined must have an idea whats out there. Nothing more
Sorry for coming at you like that, cfig. My apologies
May. 08 '08
cfig said:No prob, the similarity is just surprising (particularly considering the name) but i know stuff like that can happen. sorry if you thought i implied otherwise.
and i actually didn't know you could see who sunk or floated a logo til now :)
May. 08 '08
ClimaxDesigns said:@cfig , don't let that stop you from voting, you don't have to have a reason for voting something down and if you thought it was a rip and sunk it, then so be it, its not like there is a prize or something for the most floated logo or that you would ruining someones reputation for doing so, i think that we get too wrapped up sometimes in these options, might just remove all interactivity from the site and see who still uses it :D, and on the other side of that, the designer is more than welcome to question what they think is a shady float or swim, just don't expect and answer because that person doest 'owe' you one.
Please login/register to make a comment, registration is easy, signup
May. 31 '07
kosta said:smart idea