Well done Chad, you took a common aperture shape and created something very unique and memorable.
Chad Sanderson said on
Mar. 03 '10
Thanks rad, petro, and fabian.
And you're right Tony, I completely agree with you. The client didn't want to have anything directly camera related, so I went more for the abstract and implied. The camera focus was meant to be secondary anyway. Thanks for the feedback!
They bought it right? I like the fact that it's not overkill on the whole camera thing but done with love.
Chad Sanderson said on
Mar. 03 '10
Thanks dikkers and Tony. :)
@Mike: It's looking like this one will be heading to the unused concept pile. The client really liked it, but decided my other version was more relevant to her industry.
JoePrince said on Mar. 01 '10
Chad Sanderson said on Mar. 01 '10
michaelspitz said on Mar. 01 '10
oronoz ® said on Mar. 01 '10
Chad Sanderson said on Mar. 01 '10
logoboom said on Mar. 01 '10
Chad Sanderson said on Mar. 01 '10
almosh82 said on Mar. 01 '10
andreiu said on Mar. 02 '10
sbj said on Mar. 02 '10
firebrand said on Mar. 02 '10
logoholik said on Mar. 02 '10
birofunk said on Mar. 02 '10
http://logopond.com/gallery/detail/50965
Chad Sanderson said on Mar. 02 '10
And thank you for the link funkosaur, although I'm pretty sure they can stand on their own. :)
birofunk said on Mar. 02 '10
Chad Sanderson said on Mar. 02 '10
Mikeymike said on Mar. 02 '10
Chad Sanderson said on Mar. 02 '10
hamidos said on Mar. 02 '10
dotflo said on Mar. 02 '10
Chad Sanderson said on Mar. 02 '10
jerron said on Mar. 02 '10
OcularInk said on Mar. 02 '10
Chad Sanderson said on Mar. 02 '10
muse7 said on Mar. 02 '10
mamal2003 said on Mar. 03 '10
rony xu said on Mar. 03 '10
Chad Sanderson said on Mar. 03 '10
radhacelis said on Mar. 03 '10
Petro said on Mar. 03 '10
brandsimplicity said on Mar. 03 '10
Chad Sanderson said on Mar. 03 '10
And you're right Tony, I completely agree with you. The client didn't want to have anything directly camera related, so I went more for the abstract and implied. The camera focus was meant to be secondary anyway. Thanks for the feedback!
dikkers said on Mar. 03 '10
logomotive said on Mar. 03 '10
Chad Sanderson said on Mar. 03 '10
@Mike: It's looking like this one will be heading to the unused concept pile. The client really liked it, but decided my other version was more relevant to her industry.
logomotive said on Mar. 03 '10
Tømme said on Mar. 05 '10
logoboom said on Mar. 07 '10
Chad Sanderson said on Mar. 07 '10
@Glen- That really means a lot coming from someone I respect as much as you do. I'll keep on trucking until I get the hang of this design thing!
Chad Sanderson said on Mar. 29 '10
HenriqueSalomao said on May. 06 '10
Chad Sanderson said on Jun. 13 '10
oski said on Jul. 14 '10
Chad Sanderson said on Jul. 15 '10
hanuman shakti said on Jul. 19 '10
lumavine said on Aug. 21 '10
Chad Sanderson said on Aug. 27 '10
simon™ said on May. 04 '11
LadyGrey said on May. 07 '11
chanpion said on Oct. 30 '11
Please login/register to make a comment, registration is easy, signup