@mcdseven - Awesome! It was kind of a trick fit... But that's the thing about 'plants' > they're quite often fractals to begin with... ;) Thanks a lot!
@andreiu & JF - Ha! I was kind of afraid of that... ;) When I finished his one, it definitely stood out for me as well... There is a certain 'random organic' quality that I had to leave out of this one in order to bump the visibility, and that I do miss from the larger mark... As it stands now, I think I'd probably like to try my hand at inplementing both > (The original, for use in most cases, and porbably this guy on the smaller end) Branding wise I think they're playing well together...so perhaps I can figure out a system to borrow the best of both worlds? ;) Cheers guys!
@logomotive - Good deal! Thanks Mike!
@matjak & birofunk - Thanks so much guys! :)
@m1sternoname - HA! You know it... ;) Thanks a lot!
*^^^^^Cheers Guys! :)* Took a bit of tweaking, but I'm very happy with how the little guy turned out! The ultimate goal was a strong sense of brand cohesion > so if you feel I've hit that, I'm deffenitley pleased to hear it! Thanks again! I really appreciate the comments!! :)
jn said on
Feb. 01 '10
Haha i love this even more than the other :) Good job!
Great identity! The flowers are a great visual element that is "ownable" to you and looks great on its own or as a pattern. After looking at your other links, I like this version with less petals- maybe because this is the first one I saw...
Phane said on
Feb. 02 '10
very nice, but for me it looks just like a customized logo for Mtv , you know ?
@ryanlynndesign - Thanks a lot Ryan!! Really appreciate it! A key focus for the whole set has definitely been its extended branding capability, and so I'm definitely happy to hear it's doing it's job! Cheers! :)
@Phane - I love your work, and as a result I certainly respect you opinion... However, in this case I'm afraid I'm going to have to side with Kevin & Joe... ^Having said that > If by chance someone @ MTV decides they 'like this so much' they want to give me a call...? You can be damn sure I'd happy hear from you..! ;)
@ask / felro / mattaebersold - Thanks a lot guys! Really appreciate the comments! :)
Phane said on
Feb. 03 '10
@ Michael . 10x , I also appreciate your showcase , and this logo too. But when I saw this printed, that was my first feeling. That's all. Maybe this is just in my head :) Actually... if I'm the only one with this opinion so I need to admit that I have a problem :)) Cheers
@Phane - :) No problem my good man!! Media is definitely a saturated thing...and I can totally understand where you were coming from... In any case, regardless of the point, I always appreciate the feedback > it only makes things stronger. Thanks a bunch! :)
@michael, top stuff. i'm amazed at how great it looks even at smaller sizes (i.e.your gravatar). anyway, been meanin' to ask: why pedals? don't get me wrong, I love it, just curious as to how you feel it conveys yourself and your work?
sidebar: i have to admit that I thought they were feathers when I first saw the mark. reminded me a little of some imaginary creature you'd find in a Dr. Seuss book (this is a compliment, btw!) ;)
@onesummer - First off, thanks so much!! :)
In an attempt to answer your question > I've definitely thought about it, and although I've honestly had a spot of difficulty explaining my thinking..I think in fact the reasoning is fairly straightforward?
Firstly, I've always had a very strong attachment to natural materials, and wood in particular... (Its strength, its endurance, its intricacy & texture...and of course the fact that each piece is unique...)
If you'll refer to my previous mark (just re-uploaded) HERE (While this might be a bit of a stretch...) > If you'd consider my previous mark as the 'trunk of the tree'...I think I'd like to consider this new 'evolution' > the growth (i.e. the 'leaves') of that same tree...
*Just to clarify (despite the vibrant coloring, again my original intention with these mark's are 'leaves' vs 'petals'...but the basic concept holds water in both cases I suppose) ;)
Again, along with that strong attachment to the organism & feel of natural materials, I've always been one for a level of distillation & order (hence the tightness of original mark.) And, as I mentioned to Alen > I've always been one for an extreme attention to detail (probably best illustrated in my information design.)
Thus, my hope is that this new identity serves to echo my goal of achieving all the qualities mentioned above, along with (the true unpredictability/underlying order persistent in nature) if that if that makes any sense?
*On a side note (I have been told I'd likely do well as a 'sculptor'...that, or a 'forensic pathologist'...) But for the #1 > the pay's a bit iffy... For #2 > I'm honestly not that into forensics or pathology... ;)
^^^Anyway *Wow...* That's totally long winded... If you made it this far, clearly I'm impressed..!
Hope this helps a bit to explain the thought process? I'm definitely Seuss fan all the way! ;) Thanks again for the comment!
@Hayes Image - Thanks a lot Josh! Really appreciate it!
Pleased to hear you liked the ID set on flickr! > Still working on it, but it's getting there... :)
@Gafyn - Ha! Thanks so much Gafyn! Really appreciate it! Means a lot! :)
Chad Sanderson said on
Feb. 09 '10
It took me ten minutes of scrolling through the comments to realize I hadn't actually left one. That being said...
This easily the best thing in your showcase. It's one of those timeless pieces that all the blogs will be talking about for the next couple years. Congratulations on creating something that really suits you.
@Chad Sanderson - ^Ha! ;) Thanks so much Chad! I really appreciate it! :) A lot of 'me' went into this set, and honestly, I just couldn't be happier! If I were wearing a hat, you can be sure I'd be tipping it to you... ;) Thanks again! Cheers!!
@beczukdavid - While you aren't the first person to bring up the reference...I will say as I have before > that mtv's 'M' is one of the more ubiquitous media icons you're to likely to come across. Thus, due to simple media saturation, truly any bolded 'M' could probably stand to comparison... That said, I believe the identity stands strongly on its own, and so I certainly don't mind the offhand reference every once in a while... ;) Thanks for the comment.
jerron said on
May. 14 '10
What, that's an M? I thought it was a pair of leafy pants. Just joking!
@AnthonyLane - ^^Ha! ;) Seriously! I mean what are we...a bunch of mindless media sponges?
^As for silkscreen...she's a comin' ;) A buddy back home actually offered to start a run for me last month... But to be honest, it's really the kind of thing I'd prefer to oversee/execute myself. At the moment, Croatia doesn't appear to be the best spot to be setting up physical production...however I am working on swinging something else stateside.
Rest assured my good man > you have a secure standing order on the first run!
mcdseven said on Jan. 30 '10
michaelspitz said on Jan. 30 '10
It was kind of a trick fit... But that's the thing about 'plants' > they're quite often fractals to begin with... ;) Thanks a lot!
@thisGuy - Cheers! Thanks again! :)
myerohov said on Jan. 30 '10
michaelspitz said on Jan. 30 '10
andreiu said on Jan. 30 '10
JF said on Jan. 30 '10
logomotive said on Jan. 31 '10
matjak said on Jan. 31 '10
m1sternoname said on Jan. 31 '10
birofunk said on Jan. 31 '10
michaelspitz said on Jan. 31 '10
There is a certain 'random organic' quality that I had to leave out of this one in order to bump the visibility, and that I do miss from the larger mark... As it stands now, I think I'd probably like to try my hand at inplementing both > (The original, for use in most cases, and porbably this guy on the smaller end) Branding wise I think they're playing well together...so perhaps I can figure out a system to borrow the best of both worlds? ;) Cheers guys!
@logomotive - Good deal! Thanks Mike!
@matjak & birofunk - Thanks so much guys! :)
@m1sternoname - HA! You know it... ;) Thanks a lot!
OcularInk said on Jan. 31 '10
lefty said on Jan. 31 '10
michaelspitz said on Jan. 31 '10
michaelspitz said on Jan. 31 '10
logoboom said on Jan. 31 '10
raja said on Jan. 31 '10
michaelspitz said on Jan. 31 '10
Bitencourt said on Jan. 31 '10
logomotive said on Jan. 31 '10
logomotive said on Jan. 31 '10
michaelspitz said on Jan. 31 '10
@logomotive - Ha! ;) > TOTALLY know what you mean! Thanks again Mike!! :)
ethereal said on Jan. 31 '10
alterego said on Jan. 31 '10
dotflo said on Feb. 01 '10
nitish.b said on Feb. 01 '10
i c a hunched-back yeti
rony xu said on Feb. 01 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 01 '10
Took a bit of tweaking, but I'm very happy with how the little guy turned out! The ultimate goal was a strong sense of brand cohesion > so if you feel I've hit that, I'm deffenitley pleased to hear it! Thanks again! I really appreciate the comments!! :)
jn said on Feb. 01 '10
eziemac said on Feb. 01 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 01 '10
alto said on Feb. 01 '10
jn said on Feb. 01 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 01 '10
@alto - Cheers! Really appreciate it!
@jn - Ha! Rumble in the jungle... ;)
Wizemark said on Feb. 01 '10
bigoodis said on Feb. 01 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 01 '10
lboi said on Feb. 01 '10
logomotive said on Feb. 01 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 01 '10
@logomotive - Thanks a bunch Mike! Really appreciated your feedback on the whole set! Cheers! :)
logomotive said on Feb. 01 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 01 '10
@absoludicrous - Cheers Anthony! Thanks so much! :)
JoePrince said on Feb. 01 '10
Rokac said on Feb. 01 '10
chirp said on Feb. 01 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 01 '10
@Rokac - Thanks a lot Roko! Cheers!
@chirp - Thanks so much Todd! Means a lot!
snowkai said on Feb. 01 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 01 '10
vinecreative said on Feb. 01 '10
talaljlilati said on Feb. 01 '10
fogra said on Feb. 02 '10
KonradK said on Feb. 02 '10
cresk said on Feb. 02 '10
AlexWende said on Feb. 02 '10
nitish.b said on Feb. 02 '10
koodoz said on Feb. 02 '10
cerise said on Feb. 02 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 02 '10
ryanlynndesign said on Feb. 02 '10
Phane said on Feb. 02 '10
OcularInk said on Feb. 02 '10
JoePrince said on Feb. 02 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 02 '10
@Phane - I love your work, and as a result I certainly respect you opinion... However, in this case I'm afraid I'm going to have to side with Kevin & Joe...
^Having said that > If by chance someone @ MTV decides they 'like this so much' they want to give me a call...?
You can be damn sure I'd happy hear from you..! ;)
@OcularInk & JoePrince - Thanks again guys!
j-CAZ said on Feb. 02 '10
Gafyn said on Feb. 02 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 02 '10
ask said on Feb. 02 '10
felro said on Feb. 02 '10
mattaebersold said on Feb. 02 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 02 '10
Phane said on Feb. 03 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 03 '10
Thanks a bunch! :)
oronoz ® said on Feb. 03 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 03 '10
muse7 said on Feb. 04 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 05 '10
onesummer said on Feb. 06 '10
sidebar: i have to admit that I thought they were feathers when I first saw the mark. reminded me a little of some imaginary creature you'd find in a Dr. Seuss book (this is a compliment, btw!) ;)
michaelspitz said on Feb. 06 '10
In an attempt to answer your question > I've definitely thought about it, and although I've honestly had a spot of difficulty explaining my thinking..I think in fact the reasoning is fairly straightforward?
Firstly, I've always had a very strong attachment to natural materials, and wood in particular... (Its strength, its endurance, its intricacy & texture...and of course the fact that each piece is unique...)
If you'll refer to my previous mark (just re-uploaded) HERE
(While this might be a bit of a stretch...) > If you'd consider my previous mark as the 'trunk of the tree'...I think I'd like to consider this new 'evolution' > the growth (i.e. the 'leaves') of that same tree...
*Just to clarify (despite the vibrant coloring, again my original intention with these mark's are 'leaves' vs 'petals'...but the basic concept holds water in both cases I suppose) ;)
Again, along with that strong attachment to the organism & feel of natural materials, I've always been one for a level of distillation & order (hence the tightness of original mark.) And, as I mentioned to Alen > I've always been one for an extreme attention to detail (probably best illustrated in my information design.)
Thus, my hope is that this new identity serves to echo my goal of achieving all the qualities mentioned above, along with (the true unpredictability/underlying order persistent in nature) if that if that makes any sense?
*On a side note (I have been told I'd likely do well as a 'sculptor'...that, or a 'forensic pathologist'...)
But for the #1 > the pay's a bit iffy... For #2 > I'm honestly not that into forensics or pathology... ;)
^^^Anyway *Wow...* That's totally long winded... If you made it this far, clearly I'm impressed..!
Hope this helps a bit to explain the thought process?
I'm definitely Seuss fan all the way! ;)
Thanks again for the comment!
Cheers! :)
onesummer said on Feb. 06 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 06 '10
Hayes Image said on Feb. 06 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 06 '10
Pleased to hear you liked the ID set on flickr! > Still working on it, but it's getting there... :)
Gafyn said on Feb. 09 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 09 '10
Chad Sanderson said on Feb. 09 '10
This easily the best thing in your showcase. It's one of those timeless pieces that all the blogs will be talking about for the next couple years. Congratulations on creating something that really suits you.
michaelspitz said on Feb. 09 '10
A lot of 'me' went into this set, and honestly, I just couldn't be happier!
If I were wearing a hat, you can be sure I'd be tipping it to you... ;) Thanks again! Cheers!!
Alisa1711 said on Feb. 14 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 14 '10
JoePrince said on Feb. 14 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 15 '10
Cheers again!! Actually, sometimes I think I catch it staring back.....
gizm0 said on Feb. 16 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 17 '10
nido said on Feb. 17 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 17 '10
Tømme said on Feb. 24 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 24 '10
Lecart said on Feb. 24 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 24 '10
AlexWende said on Feb. 27 '10
michaelspitz said on Feb. 27 '10
bruno veloso said on Mar. 02 '10
michaelspitz said on Mar. 02 '10
muse7 said on Mar. 12 '10
michaelspitz said on Mar. 17 '10
rick! said on Apr. 12 '10
michaelspitz said on Apr. 13 '10
agingersnaps said on Apr. 22 '10
mcguire design said on Apr. 22 '10
luiz_adelino said on Apr. 22 '10
michaelspitz said on Apr. 22 '10
zibbidy said on Apr. 25 '10
michaelspitz said on Apr. 25 '10
Double A said on May. 13 '10
michaelspitz said on May. 14 '10
beczukdavid said on May. 14 '10
michaelspitz said on May. 14 '10
jerron said on May. 14 '10
I wish I had a pair of leafy pants.
michaelspitz said on May. 14 '10
^As for silkscreen...she's a comin' ;) A buddy back home actually offered to start a run for me last month... But to be honest, it's really the kind of thing I'd prefer to oversee/execute myself. At the moment, Croatia doesn't appear to be the best spot to be setting up physical production...however I am working on swinging something else stateside.
Rest assured my good man > you have a secure standing order on the first run!
michaelspitz said on May. 14 '10
palattecorner said on May. 19 '10
blakemcdivitt said on Jun. 22 '10
michaelspitz said on Jun. 22 '10
@blakemcdivitt - Thanks so much Blake! Really truly appreciate it! :)
ALL4LEO said on Oct. 14 '10
michaelspitz said on Oct. 15 '10
13mu said on Dec. 15 '10
michaelspitz said on Dec. 15 '10
Alex K. said on Feb. 28 '11
michaelspitz said on Mar. 10 '11
macov said on Apr. 23 '11
michaelspitz said on Apr. 24 '11
theissland said on Jul. 08 '11
Shubho said on Aug. 18 '11
nickhood said on Aug. 29 '11
Please login/register to make a comment, registration is easy, signup