That's a hot mark! I even think the type would be strong all by itself, but very nice looking together. The weights on Interactive look off to me though...
valiant said on
Jan. 28 '10
yeah I think I'm going to have to adjust them now that I have seen it this small :P thanks joe
valiant said on
Jan. 29 '10
Edit: Changed the weight of "interactive" so that it would read a bit better at smaller sizes.
Oh forgot - i like the mark! I think the type could use some work.
valiant said on
Jan. 31 '10
Thanks all!
@alexanderspliid - Its a pheonix
@jn - I would be interested to hear what you think could be done to improve the type, this logo is not completely final. Also I thought the type was pretty solid, so any tips on improvement would be greatly appreciated.
JoePrince said on Jan. 28 '10
valiant said on Jan. 28 '10
valiant said on Jan. 29 '10
tulrich said on Jan. 29 '10
mattaebersold said on Jan. 30 '10
xm said on Jan. 31 '10
alexanderspliid said on Jan. 31 '10
xm said on Jan. 31 '10
jn said on Jan. 31 '10
jn said on Jan. 31 '10
valiant said on Jan. 31 '10
@alexanderspliid - Its a pheonix
@jn - I would be interested to hear what you think could be done to improve the type, this logo is not completely final. Also I thought the type was pretty solid, so any tips on improvement would be greatly appreciated.
hamidos said on Jan. 31 '10
Logocrave said on Feb. 01 '10
valiant said on Feb. 01 '10
graphican said on Feb. 06 '10
Please login/register to make a comment, registration is easy, signup