Forgive me -- I really like your design idea here, but it looks woefully off-balance. It's the 'miss' that's small, grayed-out, and providing a gap between it and the logomark. Plus, the logomark is not 'centered' over the horizontal plane of the name. And, it's at an angle, though that's not so bad.
What would make me a fan of this logo: if the 'burst' logomark was centered over the 'm'...so the letter was sort of the starting point for the burst-like mark. Gray is not synonymous with light, and the mark looks to represent potential, light, et cetera. Perhaps a mor vibrant shade of pink or red? What do you think?
JF said on Aug. 28 '09
What would make me a fan of this logo: if the 'burst' logomark was centered over the 'm'...so the letter was sort of the starting point for the burst-like mark. Gray is not synonymous with light, and the mark looks to represent potential, light, et cetera. Perhaps a mor vibrant shade of pink or red? What do you think?
Brandsimplicity said on Aug. 28 '09
JF said on Aug. 28 '09
Brandsimplicity said on Aug. 28 '09
Please login/register to make a comment, registration is easy, signup