This is an all time favorite. I love the application on the tail of the plane. It inspired me a few years back. The work you (ideogram) do is in contention with some world class ID programs.
Bueno! You guys do some nice work indeed. It looks like you have some anti-aliasing going on with this particular image. It would make an even bigger impression if you fixed that but the logo is beautiful.
miguel1 said on
Jan. 02 '07
Love it, I think it's suppose to have that anti-aliasing look? maybe I'm not seeing the same thing. Think distant star and not being able to capture good resolution.
I've definitely seen the pixelation thing done a million times before. In my opinion doing something like this make it hard to use as an "identifiable mark." It's a little too generic to function as well as it should.
That being said, it still looks nice.
sounds a bit more like viagra type medication. bad name for airline. because of that the symbol need to be more clear as to what the company does. just a thought :)
I'm familiar with your work... Ideograma was part of a Design Conference that I was lucky to be a part of as an event planer a few years back in Hermosillo. It's called Creactivo. Congrats on Volaris... it's chingon! ;)
even tho the pixel aspect may have been used several times most design is just a mimetic echo of something else. what i do love about this one is the concept of the polaris star and the colours used. nice work.
It's hard not to think of Kluwer when being exposed to this mark. But there's only so many directions one can go with this type of treatment without risking doing something not done before. That said, execution (given the background) is done pretty good.
I'm not entirely convinced about the composition altogether (would have moved mark and type closer) but that is merely a personal preference.
I was in San Diego, for Thanksgiving, and saw this logo in use on busses and bus terminals. Although I like the logo on screen, the logo really translated poorly into print. I suspect most of the poor translation is due to a lack of quality control or management over the printing of signs, kiosks, etc and not a problem with the logo itself.
OcularInk said on Dec. 19 '06
Kevin
ideograma said on Dec. 19 '06
Carl
SpiffyJ said on Dec. 19 '06
raja said on Dec. 19 '06
Bravo!
vinecreative said on Dec. 19 '06
OcularInk said on Dec. 19 '06
mebs said on Dec. 26 '06
cesab68 said on Dec. 26 '06
bpotstra said on Dec. 27 '06
lewiscot said on Dec. 27 '06
miguel1 said on Jan. 02 '07
OcularInk said on Jan. 07 '07
Goders said on Jan. 08 '07
kult house said on Jan. 16 '07
jaycreate said on Jan. 30 '07
solidcreative said on Feb. 08 '07
how's it work on white?
nice one 1
liquisoft said on Feb. 25 '07
That being said, it still looks nice.
leighindubai said on Mar. 28 '07
ilyagleikh said on Apr. 24 '07
brandsimplicity said on May. 28 '07
xzentrico said on Jun. 02 '07
evdbent said on Jun. 13 '07
Kliment said on Jun. 28 '07
s7even said on Jun. 30 '07
erifreak said on Jul. 03 '07
shmoo said on Jul. 04 '07
guezworks said on Jul. 09 '07
gustavoe said on Jul. 10 '07
tomonet said on Jul. 18 '07
sans said on Jul. 30 '07
I'm not entirely convinced about the composition altogether (would have moved mark and type closer) but that is merely a personal preference.
liquisoft said on Nov. 25 '07
pokayoke said on Aug. 05 '08
wakbrdfr said on Dec. 22 '08
chrisrojo said on Oct. 28 '09
Pinche said on Dec. 12 '09
you made it the logo?
Pierro said on Mar. 06 '11
mcdseven said on Mar. 06 '11
Please login/register to make a comment, registration is easy, signup