sorry, my english not good ... I ment that "giantgoose" type should be smaller. But now I am not sure if it would be better.
epsilon said on
Jan. 30 '09
Niiice .. I disagree with Jan though - seeing the goose head is not a problem. It's not obvious, but it only takes a second to figure it out once one looks at the name.
edwinseah said on
Jan. 30 '09
janzabransky: Thanks for that suggestion. I gave it a try but i still prefer the current version.
epsilon: I'm glad you find it nice.
jsae said on
Jan. 31 '09
i dig this a lot!
edwinseah said on
Jan. 31 '09
Thanks jsae and everyone who floated.
edwinseah said on
Feb. 03 '09
Hi everyone, i need some advice over here. Do you think i should add in more details to the mark to make it more obvious?
well, I say no, but if you are pressures, you could so the form of the head in a very light gray, watermark light, behind everything.
billiumk said on
Feb. 22 '09
Hi there, We're looking for someone to create a logo for us. Please follow this link for more info: "http://logopond.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=2799":http://logopond.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=2799 thanks!
edwinseah said on Jan. 30 '09
janzabransky said on Jan. 30 '09
epsilon said on Jan. 30 '09
edwinseah said on Jan. 30 '09
epsilon: I'm glad you find it nice.
jsae said on Jan. 31 '09
edwinseah said on Jan. 31 '09
edwinseah said on Feb. 03 '09
THEArtistT said on Feb. 03 '09
billiumk said on Feb. 22 '09
tass said on Aug. 02 '09
creatier said on May. 23 '10
Don't add detail is my advice. Simplicity that makes this work.
ClimaxDesigns said on May. 23 '10
dadocinqo said on Jul. 07 '11
I'm curious, is this logo in use by your client?
Please login/register to make a comment, registration is easy, signup