Logopond

Congratulations helvetic brands on being the first user to upload 1000 logos, what a machine!

by • Uploaded:

8680

Status: Nothing set

Commenting: Not seeking critique, comments fine

View Swimmers: 0

More from this user:

grabbdesigns said on Jan. 05 '09

nice, simple and obvious - i like ;)

sdijock said on Jan. 05 '09

Great logo. I know you've kept the space open to the left of the check mark because that's the space that the complete "V" would have taken up. However, the hole it's creating is a little visually disruptive to the flow of the logo. Nice regardless.

OcularInk said on Jan. 05 '09

Hmm, I kind of think the 'V' is where it should be. The negative space there helps reinforce the idea that the check mark was formed by the V. If the V is moved closer, legibility could be sacrificed. You have a point though, Steve (sdijock).

sdijock said on Jan. 05 '09

I personally prefer the updated kerning, but I think it's an incredible logo either way.

gyui said on Jan. 05 '09

i think it's great penflare, wouldn't change a thing on this version.

epsilon said on Jan. 05 '09

Kerning between E and V is too tight. Also Logo type looks thinner than Review part, not sure if it's intentional.

Very nice otherwise. Simple is the best.

lundeja said on Jan. 05 '09

I don't know what it is about this one, but I really enjoy it.

penflare said on Jan. 05 '09

i kerned it that way so the spacing would be the same from where the "check" is cut off next to the "e" to the top of the "check" by the "i"

penflare said on Jan. 05 '09

and its all the same weight

epsilon said on Jan. 05 '09

I figured it must've been the same weight. Typically the dark-on-light type needs more weight to look the same as light-on-dark version. I just wasn't sure if you _wanted_ Logo to look thinner.

Re: kerning, I'd try pushing the checkmark to the right halfway to V's original position. It does look a bit cluttered to me right now, and I can see how the original kerning could've been too generous.