Very lovely wing forms, beautiful negative space created. But the border is so very bold and distracting. It really detracts from the great mark. It's also cramping the top of the mark. I'd recommend giving it a bit more breathing room.
I agree with the color being too light, and that the border should be a bit thinner. The symbol, although nice, resembles Idiocase quite a lot if you ask me.
What do you think?
http://www.idiocase.com/
cjkh said on
Nov. 20 '06
WHO could complain about the colors? They rock. This logo would look great in black and white and other colors too. Good job!
tonyc said on
Nov. 20 '06
good job.. don't know why but it reminds me of the old communist look :)
I see a lot of these wing creations all over the place, and they've become uninspired and cliche, for me. Not that this is a bad logo or bad work; not by any means am I suggesting it. I am merely stating that, to me, this doesn't seem very original. I've seen it before and I'm sure I'll see it again and again...and again.
Everyone's a critic. Get a bunch of designers in one place and everyone will tell you how to "fix" your design because of some "flaw." I call "BS", I don't think these guys know a good design when they see one anymore. Personally, I think the logo is fantastic. The colors and the design are great, and I have no complaints. To the guy who called your "winged" design uninspired and cliche; I think he's waiting for the next popular convention in design to appear so he can rip it off before it gets overused.
Nice logo, but the colours definetly don't say, "reliability and innovation at the same time."
OMNI said on
Nov. 28 '06
Look, it's literally imposible to please all tastes, and we're all here to read constructive criticism on our work, so I guess it's no place to get offended.
From my part, I entered to see your logo in full because it caught my eye, the colors are great. In my opinion, I'd lose the constraining box, the wings just beg to be free! Besides, it'll help the logo be more flexible and move the mark around or even separate it from the type in some applications. Cool work.
Cy said on
Nov. 30 '06
...here the same! I like that logo a lot and I love the colors. The wings and the shape of the frame are great!
KGB said on Nov. 09 '06
OcularInk said on Nov. 09 '06
-Kevin
somos said on Nov. 09 '06
just that... is a good composition I really like it
graphicart21 said on Nov. 09 '06
nbraxton said on Nov. 13 '06
tynell said on Nov. 20 '06
What do you think?
http://www.idiocase.com/
cjkh said on Nov. 20 '06
tonyc said on Nov. 20 '06
mebs said on Nov. 20 '06
i DO see quite a resemblance between it and the idiocase logo.
liquisoft said on Nov. 20 '06
madrid said on Nov. 21 '06
shaneg said on Nov. 21 '06
OMNI said on Nov. 28 '06
From my part, I entered to see your logo in full because it caught my eye, the colors are great. In my opinion, I'd lose the constraining box, the wings just beg to be free! Besides, it'll help the logo be more flexible and move the mark around or even separate it from the type in some applications. Cool work.
Cy said on Nov. 30 '06
bazizi said on Jan. 04 '07
if i hadn't read the description i would have thought it's a army logo.
color don't help, it's still a military badge.
cobaltcow said on Jan. 08 '07
I think I have to agree on the green being a bit light though - esp. on white. It just gets a bit lost.
Please login/register to make a comment, registration is easy, signup