I love this, I think the colours are great, great composition.
I think the mark could be larger, the type seems to be overbalancing the design. but a lot of people may disagree with me on that :D
What I dislike about it, is that it will look worse in grayscale, and even worse in monochromatic version. The dots will loose all focus they have because of colors, and will be looking ... strange.
i actually think this may work better with networking underneath precision, and maybe position the text to the right of the mark. its just such a long name
epsilon said on
Nov. 09 '08
Thanks, revolve. I hear you, it's exactly one of few other versions that I didn't post.
revolvedesign said on Nov. 03 '08
I think the mark could be larger, the type seems to be overbalancing the design. but a lot of people may disagree with me on that :D
nice work
sebastiany said on Nov. 03 '08
robak said on Nov. 03 '08
chng! said on Nov. 03 '08
epsilon said on Nov. 03 '08
@robak - the B/W version uses dots of varying sizes in place of color shades. I'll post this version a bit later.
@chng! - rotated 180 deg, and I'm not sure I can see the P .. also the logo as whole looks less balanced with a brighter accent on top.
Thanks for the feedback, guys. Much appreciated.
epsilon said on Nov. 04 '08
thomas said on Nov. 07 '08
epsilon said on Nov. 07 '08
jonsamwell said on Nov. 09 '08
epsilon said on Nov. 09 '08
revolvedesign said on Nov. 09 '08
epsilon said on Nov. 09 '08
:-)
maximalist said on Dec. 05 '08
penflare said on Dec. 06 '08
joder said on Dec. 07 '08
epsilon said on Dec. 07 '08
raja said on Dec. 15 '08
MichaelX2 said on Dec. 30 '08
fishinapond said on Jan. 18 '09
rogeroddone said on Jan. 20 '09
samuelreis said on Feb. 12 '09
epsilon said on Feb. 12 '09
geniuslogo said on Mar. 19 '09
Stephen James said on Mar. 19 '09
tass said on Jun. 05 '09
bsehenuk said on Jul. 15 '09
michaelspitz said on Sep. 22 '09
hanuman shakti said on Sep. 06 '11
Please login/register to make a comment, registration is easy, signup