I like this alot. The "t" really stands out alot more than the "m". Maybe try joining the ends of the "t" to the two side parts of the "m" so it's all one piece - still keeping the "t" a different shade...?
I like it. In my opinion, it's "lacking" in some area, but I can't quite put my finger on it. I like the M and T being separate in the mark, maybe it's the font choice? I dunno.
I think you have a nice logo going on here. However, I'm wondering how the mark would look without the black box around it and 'Metro Turf' changed to all black.
Gotta admit I agree, I saw ITI first - only looking at the first comment made me look at the name and realise it should be an 'M'. I also think 'Metroturf' is a bit too close to the mark.
yeah, I read ITI first, too, sorry. and I don't care for the extras (like the highlight on the T in the mark). I think this would look so much better if you loose the gradients, and leave it in a one or two flat color version.
Oh man, I love it...the only things...and this is constructive criticism, as was previously mentioned, It's a bit harder to see an "M"...i see the "T" right away though. Also I think it would look great if instead of just a black rectangle around the icon itself, maybe it would look good with the black rectangle around all of it, that way the name itself stands out too.
jwadenpfuhl said on Oct. 25 '06
CreativeGuy said on Oct. 31 '06
OcularInk said on Nov. 01 '06
-Kevin
elementdw said on Nov. 12 '07
admarcbart said on Nov. 12 '07
drewboy said on Jan. 15 '08
artboy said on Jan. 15 '08
onesummer said on Jan. 15 '08
Lawrence Anderson said on Jan. 15 '08
hoshi6 said on Jan. 15 '08
oarso said on Jan. 16 '08
jeffthefinn said on Jan. 16 '08
dariux said on Jan. 18 '08
leighton_hubbell said on Jan. 23 '08
admarcbart said on Jan. 23 '08
kellyoneill said on May. 01 '08
Please login/register to make a comment, registration is easy, signup