^ Hey Pal, don't go accusing me of stealing anything. WHY don't you check out my portfolio and see for yourself that I don't need to steal anyones ideas. As GOD as my witness I have never seen that logo or anything close to that. So I guess nothing new under the sun has been done huh. I know for myself the truth and sure others believe me.
And by the way it's usually the other way around. I'm always chasing pirates ARRG! except they blantantly RIP my stuff, this is purely coincidental, honestly.
You know this really ticks me off. Let me explain in details here that This started off playing around with 5 of the same triangles (notice the angles). The fox was accidental and I was not actually trying to design a fox but I arrived at this and,.. well red is a common fox color and name so thought it was appropriate. Mine is simpler and different and it is MY hard work inspired by myself. So there.
Ease up there Morgri. Feel free to draw a parallel and show a potential conflicting design. I'm sure logomotive would WANT to see it, as any of us would. But before you go casting aspersions you might want to take a look at the person you're slandering. It's not like logomotive is some hack that doesn't know his way around logo design. We're ALL (ok not bart) chasing him on the top uploaders board. You try to go out and create 216 logos without a coincidence like this happening. You do this for as long as we have and it'll happen...more than once.
But like I said, PLEASE DO point out similar designs. We all want to know so we can see if it's coincidence or if maybe WE'VE been ripped. That happens all the time too. Just do it with a little respect when you're dealing with an accomplished designer like logomotive. He deserves it. Peace.
Oops...that last fact was incorrect. That's me looking at dates at 12:30 a.m.
Digital-ink said on
Oct. 09 '08
Yes i agree im a new member but been looking on the pond for years. In design sometimes things do share the same pantone and or company name but in my opinion as Relevant said the logo from the other site really has nothing on this.
Mikee, Miguel, you don´t need to give explanations, (tu no nececitas dar explicasiones). Your work speaks by itself, (tu trabajo habla por si solo)
Maybe the concept it´s a little similar (tal ves el concepto es similar) but i think the critic was very aggressive. (pero creo que la critica fue demasiado agresiva)
Cheers mate, exelent work as usual!!! Saludooos n_n
%u2018...Its like comparing Picasso with a finger painting%u2019 great phrase! jejejeje!
Morgri said on
Oct. 09 '08
I'm sorry, I may have been a little to hard on you logomotive. It might have been a coincidence or might not. It just seemed rather uncoicidental that you would get the same name, colorscheme, and similar idea as the guy on the ovc. But then again, coincidences do happen, and appropriation is a very fair idea.
Morgri said on
Oct. 09 '08
Also, don't get me wrong, your stuff is really good. It just be a reallly reallly close idea compared to the other two who had posted in the ovc.
Thanks guys, maybe I should just stick to my "illustrative" work ;-) it's hard to be simple (geometrical) and not have it done before, but to be honest it never even crossed my mind that anything would be close to this, but then probably just about every animal has been done in this orgamish like style.This just pushes me to try harder he he.
Thanks rambal
@ gareth, yeah sort of both of these were done 11/2 years ago the fox was never refined and needed work on the head I fixed that and decided to upload both. Thanks
Mogi dont be fixing it now, you bluntly acussed him of stealing other peoples hard work, now that youve been proved wrong for talking before getting your facts straigth dont try and fix it accept that u were wrong as bluntly as u acussed someone u didnt know and apologize
Morgri said on
Oct. 10 '08
Chng!, I hardly know what facts I have wrong. For I we know it's his word against mine. Sure, because he's been a logopond a while you'll probably believe him over me, but the fact remains that it his word over mine. There is absolutely no evidence presented by him that shows that he came up with this concept without some really close influence from the poster at the ovc that I is linked.
Granted, the two, are, after the finished product quite different; However, it just irritated me a lot to see someone else long time work at a different place by a different poster. Now, seeing as logomotive will continue to say it is a coincidence I will take him by his words, but again only he knows the truth.
You see that is you sticking to your statements, thats how you are suppose to be Good for you! i dont want to extend this more than what it already is but that poster, the shapes the type solution the depiction of the animal. (dude or dudette) they look nothing alike, ill have to re-read the post to see where the designer states copyright and owner ship of the color red, the animal Fox, the animal fox being red, the triangular shape, Origami arts, and tangram.
and congratulate them for the genious of coming up with such a creative, unique and completly extravagant name of red fox, considering how foxes are blue purple and green right.
but as you said we should come up with our own ideas before stealing other peoples hard work specially one with so many copyright issues
Morgri, whatever!!!! had I posted the fox online when I posted my Fish/Forward Click logo over a year ago, we would not be discussing this. Why don't you step out from under your little morgri shell. I NEVER want to be accussed of stealing!! GOT IT> Because I don't NEED to jerk.
You know if I had the task of designing a fox in which I'm only aware of 2 colors red and grey DOH! I probably would have never cam up with this VERY simple geometrical shapes, but flipping triangles around trying to shape an F fro forward Click I had 4 triangles and I said "hey that looks like a FOX" so duh I named it red fox. wanna come look into my hard drive?
Thanks guys, the comments from you guys are appreciated and lets me know that you understand, just because it looks simple does not mean it is. It was a wonderful accident of shapes that just so happened to fall into place at the just the right time. Cheers!
epsilon said on
Oct. 19 '08
Very nice.
Not sure about the ear though .. it just looks disproportionate and kinda awkward. One option is to make it smaller and move it a bit up; another - rotate clock-wise by 22.5 degrees and perhaps make it smaller too .. though either of these may look as awkward :)
Ok fine. I've seen it and admired it as a thumbnail for long enough. Love it. Love the fox. Love that he's looking away, love the text and I LOVE TANGRAMS!!!! I had a royal blue set in a little square cardboard box. Awesome.
Well we are trying to resolve the issue guys, so hold off on the comments for now. I have been in contact with the owners.
Toni check your email.
raphers said on
Feb. 03 '09
Hi, I'm Raphael from ArtFox, after discussing with both designers I decided to take down the logo and evaluate my options. I certainly do not want to offend anyone. You can read more on our decision on Bolideas blog: http://www.bolidea.com
Ralpheal well for one I am very offended. After reading your link I'm even more appalled. If you really wanted to do the right thing, you would have done what I have asked. First on the Market is irrelevant here (what hire a designer that ripped another design? before that design was made for sale?).
Now First "Published" is the copyright issue and copyright law.
There is no debate or discussion here. I do appreciate that you did take the logo down but providing this link adds to the fire.
I'm willing to work this thing out end all and even red flag my red fox if we can work together here.
It's funny to me that in the article they say that a logo doesn't make or break a brand yet they continue to drag this out and are still pondering using Dache's logo. By doing so they are just making their brand look worse. Someone please make sense of this for me.
It's funny to me that in the article they say that a logo doesn't make or break a brand yet they continue to drag this out and are still pondering using Dache's logo
LOL that's what I have been trying to figure out. Scratchin my head. maybe I need to get my eyes checked I might be missing something.?
I always thought less is more and KISS? but maybe I'm wrong here.
"Finally, while ArtFox could have done without this episode, the logo certainly does not make or break a company%u2026the product and the team do."
ARE YOU KIDDDDDDDING ME?
If it doesn't make or break a company than why have one in the first place? I'd be interested in how much they paid for dache's services and they I would ask them if it doesn't make or break a company than why did you spend ___ of money on it.. Just an unprofessional comment from a unprofessional company..
epsilon said on
Feb. 03 '09
> ARE YOU KIDDDDDDDING ME?
This blog is a part of the damage control measures they are implementing to counter all of the negative PR ArtFox managed to accumulate so far. One of the goals of the post is to try and disassociate themselves with the damaging subject and that's the only purpose of the closing remark. It's a PR management 101. I wouldn't spend too much time dissecting it.
Also, if you look at whole situation from this angle, it's obvious that they have exactly two choices -
(a) drop the logo and ideally try and make the whole incident look as an accident, i.e. try and remove any negative associations that the logo f*ckup created for ArtFox. They can also go as far as changing the name of ArtFox, but that could be quite expensive depending on how far they have advanced in marketing it.
(b) try and discredit Mike and push forward with using dache's version. This option is very risky as it can very easily backfire and permanently stain not only ArtFox, but also Bolidea and David's reputations as well.
All in all, it still looks to me as an intentional provocation on David's part. There is no way he could've been unaware of the RedFox logo. Also considering some remarks Mike made in his direction, I'm going to guess they have a "history" between themselves and this incident is just a very dumb and unfortunate escalation of it.
So if I am right, then the only civil way to end the whole thing with minimal collateral damage is for David to produce some sort of an apology and for Mike to accept it. Though probably neither of them is prepared to do that.
^ at epsilon, good observation, however I am willing to accept and move on. This whole thing will be forgotten about if they accused just do the right thing and all links will be broken, but it's snowballin now because we have stubborness.
smartinup said on
Feb. 03 '09
stubborness, the killer of oh so many great things.
dache and Mike have been members of logopond for more than a year, they are both highly visible members and know of each others work, to say that dache could have come up with this on is own is valid, but highly doubtable being that the red fox logo has been on logopond for a very long time. For you to assert that merely because the redfox logo isn't in play for that company even though it is in long standing on logopond is beyond the pale.
Would you be ok If someone learned of your art fox concept and created and launched a site almost exactly like it before you are able to launch? I think not and any lawyer worth their grain will assure you that legal action can be taken in this instance.
I will say in dache's defense that he could have certainly had Mikes logo in the back of his head and subconsciously remodeled this logo after it. Wouldn't be the first time this has ever happened to someone, wont be the last.
The solution to this issue is simple, dache needs to recreate your branding of no additional cost to your company and move on.
morvarid said on
Feb. 03 '09
It's nothing compared to the link posted. This is more elegant and classy, and as far as I remember triangles are not copyrighted!
Dache did not do his research. Pure and simple. Regardless of whether he was knowingly or subconsciously 'inspired'. That makes him initially at fault. That the ArtFox owner did not then require Dache return his money and then buy Mike%u2019s logo, or require Dache to design a completely new logo for no additional charge I do not understand. (Or that Dache did not offer those two solutions himself.) Those were the only two option once copyright infringement is confirmed. As quick as the owner thought he was in reacting to the news, he must not have been that quick, because the only reason I can think of that he did neither of those things, is because he%u2019d already dropped a bunch of money on print with Dache%u2019s logo. Well, someone at ArtFox could have done the same research Dache should have done. Simply run some descriptive and key words through a search engine. Such a quick and simple exercise would have saved all parties embarrassment. Is Dache a good designer? Yes, without a doubt. Was he stupid in not doing his research. Yes, again without a doubt. Doesn%u2019t matter how good you are, how old you are, how experienced you are, how knowledgeable you are, mistakes happen. Sucks it was this public for all. But then you are never too old to learn from and pay for your mistakes.
Thanks for your support. that's the problem with blogs. They are sometimes one sided with moderation.
Look here http://logopond.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=2530
I posted this in the forums prior to dache posting his logo. I said what my favorite logo was provided by a link. So for those of you who still think it is coincidental may want to rethink that theory.
ARRRRR
wow mike i forgot about that forum pst ... wow, but then again it still could have been one of those i saw it and subconsciously reproduced it, but what bothers me more is not that fact that the logo was obviously inspired and not the fact that its such a high profile designer that did it, my biggest problem is why hasn't dache said anything. I think hes making a bad situation worse by not just saying, publicly 'hey guys i muffed this one, totally forgot about mikes logo, my bad back to the drawing board.'
I think all would have been forgiven save a few jokes on his behalf here and there and this sould be behind everyone. But for him not to say anything and for the art fox people to put out a statement almost in defense of this situation is ridiculous. Some times you get egg on your face, best to just wipe if off and keep moving, don't leave the egg on your face and pretend its not there ffs.
The sad thing is I'm willing to negotiate a deal, red flag, remove or have any comments removed via blogs. Stubborness is the problem here, some people cannot be wrong I guess.It's just going to keep snowballing if people do not cooperate.
well if you look at the dates in the blogs and the time I posted to the forum, I find it hard to believe that he "forgot" about Redfox. too short of time.
epsilon said on
Feb. 04 '09
^ Duh, Mike, you don't say.
Bolidea released a bunch of comments from the moderation queue. Given the content of some of them, it actually took some balls to do that.
i've only been on logopond for a short time and I respect and admire both dache and logomotives' portfolios. Usually when someone is accused of plagiarism on logopond, they come out and usually say "no, i didn't, it's a coincidence" or sometimes they say "yes, i was inspired by your design". I agree with Climax, to not hear anything from dache is disconcerting.
Just my 2 cents. Hope you find closure on this logomotive.
epsilon said on
Feb. 04 '09
> Bolidea released a bunch of comments from the moderation queue.
And now at least one comment is gone. There were 16 comments this morning, and - 15 now.
I once warned dache. Don't go stepping on peoples toes. He ignored my suggestion and I did it out of sincerity because I thought he had skills and was a good designer. He just stepped on the entire design community IMO.
I%u2019d like to apologize to Raphael from ArtFox and to Bolidea for designing a logo that is similar to Mike Erickson%u2019s RedFox. It was clearly not my intention. I did not do enough research and in the end it was my mistake from which I have learnt.
Most importantly, I%u2019d like to apologize for all the trouble and bad publicity this incident has caused. I also thank ArtFox, Bolidea and Mike of logomotives for efficiently dealing with the situation. You didn%u2019t deserve this.
Again, my apologies to all parties involved.
---
For d10 I was requested to provide stylisation of an existing logo. As I was not involved in the design and production process of the initial logo, I think that the discussion of copyright should be taken up between the designers of dreamten and Bionic systems. Incidently, the logo that I stylised, the one on logopond, was not used as they felt their existing branding, the one they have on their website, to be efficient.
"Again, my apologies to all parties involved." is not good enough!
this has to be said.. you need to apologise direct to MIke otherwise this looks like a classic case of dache a$$ kissing his clients (yet again) but not man enough to apologise to Mike!
thats an insult to designers man!.. are you so far up your own butt you cant see that?.. you come on her & apologise to your clients???.. email them!.. come on here to apologise to MIKE!
dache, I hope this thing is coming to an end. i apprecaite the fact that you actually responded. I am Mike my business is Logo's and my business name is Logo Motive Designs. I also go by the name Logomotive here on Logopond. I am not Mike of Logomotives and you know that I AM CERTAIN. I will think about this and respond when I feel comfortable that this is a sincere apology.
penflare said on Oct. 07 '08
chng! said on Oct. 07 '08
logomotive said on Oct. 07 '08
yurko said on Oct. 08 '08
logoholik said on Oct. 08 '08
dado said on Oct. 08 '08
OcularInk said on Oct. 08 '08
chng! said on Oct. 08 '08
azacarias7 said on Oct. 08 '08
logomotive said on Oct. 08 '08
Tangram huh? did not know what it was called.
nido said on Oct. 08 '08
OcularInk said on Oct. 08 '08
firebrand said on Oct. 08 '08
Love it, Mike. Works really well at thumbnail size.
Type08 said on Oct. 08 '08
Morgri said on Oct. 08 '08
To bad the whole concept is stolen. Maybe you should try figuring out your own ideas before you go stealing other peoples hard work.
logomotive said on Oct. 08 '08
logomotive said on Oct. 08 '08
logomotive said on Oct. 08 '08
gthobbs said on Oct. 08 '08
But like I said, PLEASE DO point out similar designs. We all want to know so we can see if it's coincidence or if maybe WE'VE been ripped. That happens all the time too. Just do it with a little respect when you're dealing with an accomplished designer like logomotive. He deserves it. Peace.
logomotive said on Oct. 08 '08
gthobbs said on Oct. 08 '08
logomotive said on Oct. 08 '08
gthobbs said on Oct. 08 '08
Digital-ink said on Oct. 09 '08
Great work Logomotive.
Oronoz ® said on Oct. 09 '08
Maybe the concept it´s a little similar (tal ves el concepto es similar) but i think the critic was very aggressive. (pero creo que la critica fue demasiado agresiva)
Cheers mate, exelent work as usual!!! Saludooos n_n
andreaderuggieri said on Oct. 09 '08
OcularInk said on Oct. 09 '08
dado said on Oct. 09 '08
Morgri said on Oct. 09 '08
Morgri said on Oct. 09 '08
lucadolci said on Oct. 09 '08
logomotive said on Oct. 09 '08
firebrand said on Oct. 09 '08
itsgareth said on Oct. 09 '08
Anyway, this one whilst similar to the one referencedis far and away better. Flawless execution as per usual. A tip of the hat, sir.
rambal said on Oct. 09 '08
itsgareth said on Oct. 09 '08
logomotive said on Oct. 09 '08
@ gareth, yeah sort of both of these were done 11/2 years ago the fox was never refined and needed work on the head I fixed that and decided to upload both. Thanks
The Critic said on Oct. 09 '08
chng! said on Oct. 09 '08
Morgri said on Oct. 10 '08
Granted, the two, are, after the finished product quite different; However, it just irritated me a lot to see someone else long time work at a different place by a different poster. Now, seeing as logomotive will continue to say it is a coincidence I will take him by his words, but again only he knows the truth.
Still, I have not been proved wrong in anyway.
chng! said on Oct. 10 '08
and congratulate them for the genious of coming up with such a creative, unique and completly extravagant name of red fox, considering how foxes are blue purple and green right.
but as you said we should come up with our own ideas before stealing other peoples hard work specially one with so many copyright issues
logomotive said on Oct. 10 '08
^^thanks anyhow chng!
logomotive said on Oct. 10 '08
nido said on Oct. 10 '08
nido said on Oct. 10 '08
gynemeth78 said on Oct. 13 '08
I like the mark though..
logomotive said on Oct. 13 '08
gynemeth78 said on Oct. 14 '08
gynemeth78 said on Oct. 15 '08
logomotive said on Oct. 15 '08
huyendesigner said on Oct. 15 '08
redfour said on Oct. 18 '08
logomotive said on Oct. 19 '08
epsilon said on Oct. 19 '08
Not sure about the ear though .. it just looks disproportionate and kinda awkward. One option is to make it smaller and move it a bit up; another - rotate clock-wise by 22.5 degrees and perhaps make it smaller too .. though either of these may look as awkward :)
logomotive said on Oct. 19 '08
epsilon said on Oct. 19 '08
logomotive said on Oct. 19 '08
hindmarshdesign said on Oct. 19 '08
logomotive said on Oct. 19 '08
epsilon said on Oct. 19 '08
I see it !! :) It *is* looking away, just as you said
But I'd be damned if it's obvious.
hindmarshdesign said on Oct. 20 '08
Type08 said on Oct. 20 '08
hindmarshdesign said on Oct. 20 '08
myde said on Oct. 21 '08
juliek said on Oct. 26 '08
toja said on Nov. 03 '08
logomotive said on Nov. 21 '08
logomotive said on Jan. 15 '09
http://logopond.com/gallery/detail/50459
logomotive said on Jan. 15 '09
logomotive said on Jan. 15 '09
logomotive said on Jan. 15 '09
epsilon said on Jan. 15 '09
logomotive said on Jan. 15 '09
logomotive said on Jan. 15 '09
This one is a bit touchy for me. It's a favorite of mine.
logotivity said on Jan. 15 '09
THEArtistT said on Jan. 15 '09
logomotive said on Jan. 15 '09
lundeja said on Jan. 15 '09
logomotive said on Jan. 15 '09
Logomotive said on Feb. 01 '09
epsilon said on Feb. 01 '09
logomotive said on Feb. 02 '09
logomotive said on Feb. 02 '09
Toni check your email.
raphers said on Feb. 03 '09
Thank you
logomotive said on Feb. 03 '09
Now First "Published" is the copyright issue and copyright law.
There is no debate or discussion here. I do appreciate that you did take the logo down but providing this link adds to the fire.
I'm willing to work this thing out end all and even red flag my red fox if we can work together here.
I'm at No falut here.
logomotive said on Feb. 03 '09
lundeja said on Feb. 03 '09
lundeja said on Feb. 03 '09
logomotive said on Feb. 03 '09
logomotive said on Feb. 03 '09
LOL that's what I have been trying to figure out. Scratchin my head. maybe I need to get my eyes checked I might be missing something.?
I always thought less is more and KISS? but maybe I'm wrong here.
logotivity said on Feb. 03 '09
ARE YOU KIDDDDDDDING ME?
If it doesn't make or break a company than why have one in the first place? I'd be interested in how much they paid for dache's services and they I would ask them if it doesn't make or break a company than why did you spend ___ of money on it.. Just an unprofessional comment from a unprofessional company..
epsilon said on Feb. 03 '09
This blog is a part of the damage control measures they are implementing to counter all of the negative PR ArtFox managed to accumulate so far. One of the goals of the post is to try and disassociate themselves with the damaging subject and that's the only purpose of the closing remark. It's a PR management 101. I wouldn't spend too much time dissecting it.
Also, if you look at whole situation from this angle, it's obvious that they have exactly two choices -
(a) drop the logo and ideally try and make the whole incident look as an accident, i.e. try and remove any negative associations that the logo f*ckup created for ArtFox. They can also go as far as changing the name of ArtFox, but that could be quite expensive depending on how far they have advanced in marketing it.
(b) try and discredit Mike and push forward with using dache's version. This option is very risky as it can very easily backfire and permanently stain not only ArtFox, but also Bolidea and David's reputations as well.
All in all, it still looks to me as an intentional provocation on David's part. There is no way he could've been unaware of the RedFox logo. Also considering some remarks Mike made in his direction, I'm going to guess they have a "history" between themselves and this incident is just a very dumb and unfortunate escalation of it.
So if I am right, then the only civil way to end the whole thing with minimal collateral damage is for David to produce some sort of an apology and for Mike to accept it. Though probably neither of them is prepared to do that.
logomotive said on Feb. 03 '09
smartinup said on Feb. 03 '09
ClimaxDesigns said on Feb. 03 '09
dache and Mike have been members of logopond for more than a year, they are both highly visible members and know of each others work, to say that dache could have come up with this on is own is valid, but highly doubtable being that the red fox logo has been on logopond for a very long time. For you to assert that merely because the redfox logo isn't in play for that company even though it is in long standing on logopond is beyond the pale.
Would you be ok If someone learned of your art fox concept and created and launched a site almost exactly like it before you are able to launch? I think not and any lawyer worth their grain will assure you that legal action can be taken in this instance.
I will say in dache's defense that he could have certainly had Mikes logo in the back of his head and subconsciously remodeled this logo after it. Wouldn't be the first time this has ever happened to someone, wont be the last.
The solution to this issue is simple, dache needs to recreate your branding of no additional cost to your company and move on.
morvarid said on Feb. 03 '09
THEArtistT said on Feb. 03 '09
epsilon said on Feb. 03 '09
I don't see it.
lundeja said on Feb. 03 '09
Logomotive said on Feb. 03 '09
Look here http://logopond.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=2530
I posted this in the forums prior to dache posting his logo. I said what my favorite logo was provided by a link. So for those of you who still think it is coincidental may want to rethink that theory.
ARRRRR
ClimaxDesigns said on Feb. 04 '09
I think all would have been forgiven save a few jokes on his behalf here and there and this sould be behind everyone. But for him not to say anything and for the art fox people to put out a statement almost in defense of this situation is ridiculous. Some times you get egg on your face, best to just wipe if off and keep moving, don't leave the egg on your face and pretend its not there ffs.
logomotive said on Feb. 04 '09
logomotive said on Feb. 04 '09
epsilon said on Feb. 04 '09
Bolidea released a bunch of comments from the moderation queue. Given the content of some of them, it actually took some balls to do that.
logotivity said on Feb. 04 '09
gyui said on Feb. 04 '09
Just my 2 cents. Hope you find closure on this logomotive.
epsilon said on Feb. 04 '09
And now at least one comment is gone. There were 16 comments this morning, and - 15 now.
raja said on Feb. 04 '09
logomotive said on Feb. 04 '09
THEArtistT said on Feb. 04 '09
dache said on Feb. 04 '09
Most importantly, I%u2019d like to apologize for all the trouble and bad publicity this incident has caused. I also thank ArtFox, Bolidea and Mike of logomotives for efficiently dealing with the situation. You didn%u2019t deserve this.
Again, my apologies to all parties involved.
---
For d10 I was requested to provide stylisation of an existing logo. As I was not involved in the design and production process of the initial logo, I think that the discussion of copyright should be taken up between the designers of dreamten and Bionic systems. Incidently, the logo that I stylised, the one on logopond, was not used as they felt their existing branding, the one they have on their website, to be efficient.
nido said on Feb. 04 '09
big of you to apologise to the clients.. why not a direct apology to Mike?
nido said on Feb. 04 '09
this has to be said.. you need to apologise direct to MIke otherwise this looks like a classic case of dache a$$ kissing his clients (yet again) but not man enough to apologise to Mike!
thats an insult to designers man!.. are you so far up your own butt you cant see that?.. you come on her & apologise to your clients???.. email them!.. come on here to apologise to MIKE!
THEArtistT said on Feb. 04 '09
dache said on Feb. 04 '09
THEArtistT said on Feb. 04 '09
logomotive said on Feb. 04 '09
logomotive said on Feb. 04 '09
logotivity said on Feb. 04 '09
firebrand said on Feb. 04 '09
logomotive said on Feb. 04 '09
logomotive said on Feb. 04 '09
logomotive said on Feb. 04 '09
ME
Mike of Logo Motive Designs
AKA LOGOMOTIVE ( for dache)
logomotive said on Feb. 04 '09
logomotive said on Feb. 04 '09
nido said on Feb. 04 '09
logomotive said on Feb. 04 '09
logomotive said on Feb. 05 '09
cerise said on Feb. 05 '09
logomotive said on May. 01 '10
logomotive said on May. 01 '10
logomotive said on May. 18 '10
JoePrince said on May. 18 '10
** SOLD, SOLD, SOLD ** Congrats on your sale, keep up the great work!
logomotive said on May. 18 '10
Lecart said on May. 18 '10
Lecart said on May. 18 '10
richardbaird said on May. 18 '10
logomotive said on Aug. 18 '11
logomotive said on Aug. 18 '11
jands said on Nov. 03 '11
logomotive said on Nov. 09 '11
Please login/register to make a comment, registration is easy, signup