I like the symbolism of the mark. Could be viewed as all nature, with a leaf surrounded by mountains, or has 2 hands holding nature (which I think is what you were going for) I like the concept alot.
gthobbs said on
Feb. 15 '08
Thank you. You are correct in your translation of the image. The hands come together to form an Aspen leaf, as well as protect a damaged tree, while forming the mountain range.
I love the mark. Would find it more appealing and would have better balance overall if you could use a different typeface. Something sans serif would be best IMO.
I think this is one of the best logos I've seen on here in a long time! And there are a lot of awesome logos on here.
VERY well executed. I really like that you can see the mountains, the hands and the leaf all at the same time, it's not like people will see one or the other, or one is hidden or anything.
I think the typeface is a good choice, seems very professional and structured. I think if you went with a sans serif, or all lower case, it may look too 'hippy-ish' with the nature images.
Thanks for the comments AND coming back to check out the color version guys!
mainichi said on
Apr. 27 '08
this is really a great logo but I'm very curious. nobody has found other meanings?
in italy during the '70 there was a great female movement for the equal opportunities of the female and male sex, and the symbol that the women used was the two hands linked like this logo.
image from wikipedia, look at the right side:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/it/9/9d/Femministe_anni_70.jpg
the meaning is clear, the shape of the two hands internal remember the female sex.
anyway, after that, anyone who wants to allude to female sex, make this symbol with the hands.
this is not a critique, i love the logo, but when i make a logo or a normal symbol, I need to remember that in the world there are shapes used and abused for multiple and different symbolism.
@ mainichi: Your points may very well be true and valid. However what you forget to mention is "audience". The intended audience for this is a very specific region in the US where this symbolism holds no ground and bears no meaning whatsoever. Handshakes may be viewed as vulgar in some areas but it doesn't stop the practice or use in others as a form of communication. And if someone truly chooses to read the graphic as the female reproductive organ...I'll just say that correlation is intended to represent "mother earth". Ok...that last one was a joke. But after 18 years of presenting to clients...I can justify any design on the fly.
Thank you, however, for bringing the cultural perspective on this.
mainichi said on
Apr. 28 '08
gthobbs, yours are sacred words. all designers should find a way out in these occasions.
however I didn't want to criticize your logo for his wrong message, or that can be interpreted differently, but I just shared my opinion about the double or "different by culture" meanings.
great work, thanks for not jumped on my words! :)
BigAl67 said on
May. 21 '08
Great piece of work... great concept rendered brilliantly.
This is one of my all time fav's. I'm wowed by how you've fit so much dual symbolism into just one logo--shapes forming hands, leaves, mountains, hill...and all still maintaining a strong conservation theme. Amazing!
Lucidity said on Feb. 15 '08
gthobbs said on Feb. 15 '08
sdijock said on Feb. 15 '08
admarcbart said on Feb. 15 '08
firebrand said on Feb. 15 '08
ahab said on Feb. 15 '08
Glavnicky said on Feb. 15 '08
OcularInk said on Feb. 15 '08
TwoPD said on Feb. 15 '08
Oronoz ® said on Feb. 15 '08
Lawrence Anderson said on Feb. 15 '08
mebs said on Feb. 15 '08
VERY well executed. I really like that you can see the mountains, the hands and the leaf all at the same time, it's not like people will see one or the other, or one is hidden or anything.
I think the typeface is a good choice, seems very professional and structured. I think if you went with a sans serif, or all lower case, it may look too 'hippy-ish' with the nature images.
Jeff Fisher LogoMotives said on Feb. 15 '08
djuice said on Feb. 15 '08
bpotstra said on Feb. 15 '08
logomotive said on Feb. 15 '08
secondtoughest said on Feb. 15 '08
Respiro said on Feb. 15 '08
OcularInk said on Feb. 16 '08
gthobbs said on Feb. 16 '08
And thanks to all for the positive feedback.
mariozitow said on Feb. 18 '08
nsu said on Feb. 18 '08
actiondesigner said on Feb. 18 '08
ryantoyota said on Feb. 18 '08
gthobbs said on Feb. 18 '08
bujang_keparat said on Feb. 18 '08
raja said on Feb. 24 '08
gypseemoth said on Feb. 28 '08
andrendhiq said on Mar. 05 '08
bob sakoui said on Mar. 08 '08
Logomotive said on Mar. 12 '08
gthobbs said on Mar. 12 '08
nido said on Mar. 13 '08
firebrand said on Mar. 13 '08
gthobbs said on Mar. 13 '08
mainichi said on Apr. 27 '08
in italy during the '70 there was a great female movement for the equal opportunities of the female and male sex, and the symbol that the women used was the two hands linked like this logo.
image from wikipedia, look at the right side:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/it/9/9d/Femministe_anni_70.jpg
the meaning is clear, the shape of the two hands internal remember the female sex.
anyway, after that, anyone who wants to allude to female sex, make this symbol with the hands.
this is not a critique, i love the logo, but when i make a logo or a normal symbol, I need to remember that in the world there are shapes used and abused for multiple and different symbolism.
don't you think?
mainichi said on Apr. 27 '08
gthobbs said on Apr. 27 '08
Thank you, however, for bringing the cultural perspective on this.
mainichi said on Apr. 28 '08
however I didn't want to criticize your logo for his wrong message, or that can be interpreted differently, but I just shared my opinion about the double or "different by culture" meanings.
great work, thanks for not jumped on my words! :)
BigAl67 said on May. 21 '08
gthobbs said on May. 21 '08
grubedoo said on May. 30 '08
gthobbs said on Jun. 24 '08
McGuire Design said on Jul. 12 '08
tariq-design said on Jul. 22 '08
mikeyn said on Jul. 30 '08
gthobbs said on Jul. 30 '08
But @ tariq... I'm not sure what you mean?
leo said on Sep. 09 '08
gthobbs said on Sep. 09 '08
clayandstan said on Nov. 12 '08
clayandstan said on Nov. 12 '08
gthobbs said on Nov. 12 '08
o-man said on Nov. 12 '08
gthobbs said on Nov. 13 '08
gyui said on Nov. 13 '08
gthobbs said on Nov. 13 '08
apsaracreative said on Jan. 05 '09
LoGoBoom said on Jan. 05 '09
designabot said on Jun. 04 '09
logoboom said on Jun. 09 '09
meloga said on Aug. 02 '09
logoboom said on Aug. 03 '09
ethereal said on Sep. 09 '09
logoboom said on Sep. 09 '09
squarelogo said on Sep. 09 '09
rudy hurtado said on Sep. 09 '09
logoboom said on Sep. 09 '09
firebrand said on Sep. 19 '09
logomotive said on Sep. 19 '09
logoboom said on Sep. 19 '09
Brandsimplicity said on Sep. 19 '09
logoboom said on Sep. 19 '09
nido said on Sep. 19 '09
logoboom said on Sep. 19 '09
logoboom said on Sep. 20 '09
nido said on Sep. 21 '09
logoboom said on Sep. 21 '09
raja said on Sep. 21 '09
Awesome logo bro!
logoboom said on Sep. 21 '09
logoholik said on Sep. 21 '09
logoboom said on Sep. 22 '09
fogra said on Sep. 22 '09
logoboom said on Sep. 22 '09
Thanks for FINALLY stopping by ;-)
Rokac said on Jan. 30 '10
logoboom said on Jan. 30 '10
michaelspitz said on Jan. 31 '10
logoboom said on Jan. 31 '10
logoses.com said on Feb. 28 '10
logoboom said on Mar. 01 '10
gary said on Mar. 15 '10
logoboom said on Mar. 16 '10
Rokac said on Mar. 16 '10
pjmaster said on Mar. 16 '10
logoboom said on Mar. 16 '10
peterehat said on Apr. 28 '10
logoboom said on Apr. 28 '10
Please login/register to make a comment, registration is easy, signup