The more I see this, the more I like it, but one thing that's bugging me more now is the kerning of the a-l pair. Make that pair a little tighter, make the l a tad taller and decrease the slant of the top of the t a little, and I think you may have it.
lalohead said on
Jan. 07 '08
tks guys!!, i'm gonna upload one more, with a grey background and with the changes that it has recommended to me they ryan :D
I love the concept behind this and love the cyan! The one thing that bothers me is that the talk bubble is so thick and almost draws too much attention to itself. I know you're keeping the weight in line with the type but it feels somewhat heavy for the bubble.
"The one thing that bothers me is that the talk bubble is so thick and almost draws too much attention to itself. I know you're keeping the weight in line with the type but it feels somewhat heavy for the bubble."
Exactly. This is [one of the reasons] why I suggested another font which would permit to have a more well-proportioned < k > symbol.
I think both the above linked logos are significantly different in execution. Each of these logos stand on their own...even if the concepts are similar. Just my two cents.
lalohead said on
Jan. 09 '08
thank you all for your comments, means a lot to me.
I am in agreement with Ocularink, those logos are different in execution, and the speach bubbles in this days are a overused trend, thats one of the reasons i used a typograhy not so contemporary or modern -and arial black is a modern and contemporary font, in my humble opinion :3- so the execution was unique and have a classic touch. :D
similarity? Yes. Plagerism? No. Thought bubble combination of k and r. That IS similarity. I'm not saying anything bad. The Kishrown logo probably combines everything a little better. This logo, to me, reads as "talk" not "talker".
lalohead said on
Jan. 10 '08
yeah, well the intention was that the "r" was sutil, and it's right to read "talk" or "talker".
i think that the ideas are everywere, thats why this two logos are so similars, but really different in execution, well i don't know really... but i'm sure of one thing i am not a copycat!! jejeje =P
ClimaxDesigns said on Jan. 07 '08
ryantoyota said on Jan. 07 '08
lalohead said on Jan. 07 '08
Respiro said on Jan. 07 '08
nido said on Jan. 07 '08
lalohead said on Jan. 07 '08
cmortensen said on Jan. 07 '08
tammyhart said on Jan. 07 '08
creative_07 said on Jan. 07 '08
Respiro said on Jan. 07 '08
Exactly. This is [one of the reasons] why I suggested another font which would permit to have a more well-proportioned < k > symbol.
KGB said on Jan. 09 '08
drewboy said on Jan. 09 '08
http://www.mobitel.si/slo/
OcularInk said on Jan. 09 '08
lalohead said on Jan. 09 '08
I am in agreement with Ocularink, those logos are different in execution, and the speach bubbles in this days are a overused trend, thats one of the reasons i used a typograhy not so contemporary or modern -and arial black is a modern and contemporary font, in my humble opinion :3- so the execution was unique and have a classic touch. :D
Respiro said on Jan. 09 '08
Come on, KGB... Do you intend to suggest any similarity?!...
KGB said on Jan. 10 '08
lalohead said on Jan. 10 '08
i think that the ideas are everywere, thats why this two logos are so similars, but really different in execution, well i don't know really... but i'm sure of one thing i am not a copycat!! jejeje =P
nsu said on Jan. 16 '08
lalohead said on Jan. 16 '08
Raczso said on May. 31 '09
dzungtype said on Jun. 10 '09
lalohead said on Jun. 10 '09
Please login/register to make a comment, registration is easy, signup