I agree with KGB.
You could leave out highlight on the blue part which still belongs to the "O" and then highlight the upper part of the tail instead of the lower. Just a thought, wanna help to make it perfect. : )
I like it the only problem I have is the logotype and the symbol or the colorful "Q" is to far apart, and seem seperate. They don't feel like they belong together, but two seperate entities.
It's not just the same font... but using the same font when both companies names start with "Q", and then using a nearly-identical concept for the glyph.
2 silusgrok
i live in Russia and i dont know this companies especially those logotypes. Ideas are different.
firebrand said on
Aug. 08 '07
I don't think your logo resembles the others at all. The tail could to with a little refinement though. Nice, bright and colourful like the rest of your showcase.
Darrel said on
Aug. 10 '07
"i live in Russia and i dont know this companies"
You're using the EXACT same typeface, dude. Not buying it. Not that I care that you rip off Qwest. They are evil! ;o)
Agreed, when I saw this on the front page I immediately thought Qwest. The company is sure to get a C&D if it does any business in the western hemisphere.
Qwest is a large communications company in the USA and everyone familiar with Qwest who sees this logo immediately thinks of Qwest. http://www.qwest.com/
The first 3 letters are the SAME (QWE)
Both have 5 letters
Both are in the SAME FONT
Both have the SAME kerning
Both are (black)
Both have a 'Q' icon in SAME positioning (upper right corner of text)
Both use a light blue in the Q icon
This happens all the time. In the world of design it's getting difficult to be unique. I'm sure you didn't know. but now you do. You can do something way better and different than Qwest's ugly duQling.
gcm said on Aug. 06 '07
KGB said on Aug. 06 '07
Art Machine said on Aug. 06 '07
You could leave out highlight on the blue part which still belongs to the "O" and then highlight the upper part of the tail instead of the lower. Just a thought, wanna help to make it perfect. : )
Matheus said on Aug. 06 '07
LOGOPED said on Aug. 07 '07
admarcbart said on Aug. 07 '07
brandberry said on Aug. 07 '07
silusgrok said on Aug. 07 '07
ahab said on Aug. 07 '07
mrshonuff said on Aug. 07 '07
dreamerworx said on Aug. 08 '07
shaneg said on Aug. 08 '07
silusgrok said on Aug. 08 '07
brandberry said on Aug. 08 '07
i live in Russia and i dont know this companies especially those logotypes. Ideas are different.
firebrand said on Aug. 08 '07
Darrel said on Aug. 10 '07
You're using the EXACT same typeface, dude. Not buying it. Not that I care that you rip off Qwest. They are evil! ;o)
kiddgraphicdesign said on Aug. 15 '07
cresquin said on Aug. 17 '07
utkin said on Aug. 29 '07
reezluv said on Sep. 09 '07
galegao said on Dec. 20 '07
The first 3 letters are the SAME (QWE)
Both have 5 letters
Both are in the SAME FONT
Both have the SAME kerning
Both are (black)
Both have a 'Q' icon in SAME positioning (upper right corner of text)
Both use a light blue in the Q icon
This happens all the time. In the world of design it's getting difficult to be unique. I'm sure you didn't know. but now you do. You can do something way better and different than Qwest's ugly duQling.
west said on Apr. 18 '08
folkupaul said on Jul. 16 '10
Type08 said on Apr. 06 '11
Please login/register to make a comment, registration is easy, signup