:) i think it's cool the way it works. you'd either get happy working out what the logo says or end up in a state that the logo wants you to be. not elegant enought for me but effective. good job!
I will comment more elaborate at a later time ...but seriously
@spasquini
im a pationed guy, but why the hell would you go about giving away the solution? I don|t mind critisism ...I knew what I had coming when I posted it. I will post back at a later time explaining the logo and also why a logo can be much more than just a mark. Maybe thinking outside the box for once, maybe do something unexpected for once, maybe make someone angry, sad, happy with your design for once. Cirst ...we are designers ...dont we want do do something different, break the rules of what is common and boring. And maybe design something that has a function ...not just sits there as a boring pretty paining on the wall that no one cares about the 2nd time they see it???
OH spasquini,you should'nt of done that.Dude half the fun with something like that IS trying to figure it out.Actiondesigner,this is genius.
nido said on
May. 29 '07
yeah thats a shame... your like that guy who spoils agood joke.. or see's a magic trick & then starts shoutin out how its done... killin the mood... or the guy that cried wolf... hang on.. no, no thats something else... your like homer when he robs from ned... ive lost it now!
@spasquini , not cool at all, you knew people where purposely not giving the solution away and you because you feel some moral superiority you felt you had to 'save' the next group who would not get it, I almost had a mind to delete your comment but then it would have broken the flow.
@actiondesigner I 100% agree with you and anyone who bothered to read the first line of the description (you know the one that clearly says this is for an 'exhibition' or even 'This logo is eventually going to reveal itself.'
Come on, if its not your cup of tea then move on, you even saw Dache and David Airey, give criticism without giving it away (two well respected identity designer on here). So what did you think? Giving the solution away would somehow lift you up in the eyes of others, or are you simply mean spirited in that way?
ok enough of the rant, i guess. This is/would have been one of the most discussed/looked at/puzzled over logos here until now, thanks a lot...
I was about to suggest that you could delete the last part of pasquinis comment ...remove the anti- and bring back the climax :-)
nido said on
May. 29 '07
dont delete it then.. just to keep the flow... blur out the bit that has the answer lol... it'll make it even more mysterious...
kcox said on
May. 29 '07
I got the top line but not the bottom until I read the answer which seems like a problem most people were having.
In the end, only using the top line might be the best solution. If you can get the concept with the top, considering the subject matter, wouldn't less be more?
I disagree, I think it needs to have both lines. Keep in mind, the concept suggests that the pieces need to merge together to create the final solution. And just for the record, I got it before dude posted the answer. Haha...shut-up Nido. :-P Simply BRILLIANT!!
Hi.. New member; signed up just to comment on this. Nice logo, actiondesigner. I suggest, Climax, that you put a 'SPOILER' warning on spasquini's post. He should've done that himself.
I figured it out without looking at the bottom line... but then it took me a while to figure out the hell bottom line was, haha. great stuff man.
bjmramage said on
May. 31 '07
I kept trying to say "Pulled Apart" but then it hit me what it was. Clever.
i like it.
believe said on
Jun. 01 '07
I don't understand how so many of you (especially the good designers) didn't see it right away. Come on guys, it really wasn't that hard. The average Joe wouldn't bother with it, so unless the audience is smarter than most of us, the logo probably wouldn't work. Nice text play though.
myoung1982 said on
Jun. 01 '07
Took me a few seconds to work this out. Its very clever, but I couldn't see it working. could be interesting to use in jigsaw puzzles branding as you have to join pieces together to get the picture!? nice. :)
You know ...I have actually ...in theory that is. I did a five frame snapshot when I presented it ...to show the pieces move together
About the concept. The first part was the invitation. They would first receive one part. The second part they would receive either upon arrival or later in a second handout.
Also ...the businesscard or brochure have both parts. You are abel to put them together yourself. Just place them on top of each other. That is why I think this logo is so successful. Because you would be able to read this whenever you felt like it. They are constructed to fold or overlay each other. The first part of the concept was just to draw attention. Make you puzzle. That is why its so funny to read a lot of the posts. Dont blame them though.
This is not a bad remark but I saw immediately what it was because this trick was somewhat done about 20 years ago by a very avant garde - but alas not evolved - palm maker which went/goes by the name 'Psion'
Their logo was never beautiful but very intriguing. http://www.spencer.nildram.co.uk/
@NeilMcDonald
first ..thanks for liking it:) I remember this caused quit the stir when I uploaded it. (read through the comments:)) Must be one of the most looked at "logos" on the pond. And it divided the community into "I like" and "I hate". "I hate" where either people not getting it (taking it personal) or people not seeing it as a "logo". That its not legible or doesnt fit the predefined rules that people may have of what a logo should or should not be. Dont want to go over this again:) This LOGO:) fits the concept it was intended for. :)
NeilMcDonald said on
Oct. 02 '08
Well said. And well done for getting it into Tres Logos. Great book. :)
degro said on May. 28 '07
cause i got it
kaimere said on May. 28 '07
OcularInk said on May. 28 '07
nido said on May. 28 '07
ClimaxDesigns said on May. 28 '07
ClimaxDesigns said on May. 28 '07
senterbrands said on May. 28 '07
trulywelsh said on May. 28 '07
evdbent said on May. 28 '07
OcularInk said on May. 28 '07
brandsimplicity said on May. 28 '07
nido said on May. 28 '07
LOL... ive always been cool lol...
ClimaxDesigns said on May. 28 '07
senterbrands said on May. 28 '07
bart@senterbrands.com the only thing i have i think mihght be the first word.
raja said on May. 28 '07
qureyoon said on May. 28 '07
very nice
demwunz said on May. 28 '07
reds said on May. 28 '07
winger said on May. 28 '07
tishbite said on May. 28 '07
dache said on May. 29 '07
davidairey said on May. 29 '07
It's not describable.
Art Machine said on May. 29 '07
Finally got it. And its great!
Nice one, Morten.
spasquini said on May. 29 '07
Most of people will be upset not understandign what it is and it is not giving any immediate information as a logo should do.
BtW: It is PUZZLED and you should combine the upper line with the lower in order to reconnect lines and letters.
kaimere said on May. 29 '07
actiondesigner said on May. 29 '07
@spasquini
im a pationed guy, but why the hell would you go about giving away the solution? I don|t mind critisism ...I knew what I had coming when I posted it. I will post back at a later time explaining the logo and also why a logo can be much more than just a mark. Maybe thinking outside the box for once, maybe do something unexpected for once, maybe make someone angry, sad, happy with your design for once. Cirst ...we are designers ...dont we want do do something different, break the rules of what is common and boring. And maybe design something that has a function ...not just sits there as a boring pretty paining on the wall that no one cares about the 2nd time they see it???
kaimere said on May. 29 '07
brandsimplicity said on May. 29 '07
nido said on May. 29 '07
winger said on May. 29 '07
ClimaxDesigns said on May. 29 '07
@actiondesigner I 100% agree with you and anyone who bothered to read the first line of the description (you know the one that clearly says this is for an 'exhibition' or even 'This logo is eventually going to reveal itself.'
Come on, if its not your cup of tea then move on, you even saw Dache and David Airey, give criticism without giving it away (two well respected identity designer on here). So what did you think? Giving the solution away would somehow lift you up in the eyes of others, or are you simply mean spirited in that way?
ok enough of the rant, i guess. This is/would have been one of the most discussed/looked at/puzzled over logos here until now, thanks a lot...
raja said on May. 29 '07
actiondesigner said on May. 29 '07
nido said on May. 29 '07
kcox said on May. 29 '07
In the end, only using the top line might be the best solution. If you can get the concept with the top, considering the subject matter, wouldn't less be more?
OcularInk said on May. 29 '07
ClimaxDesigns said on May. 29 '07
chanpion said on May. 29 '07
mudeth said on May. 30 '07
jackg said on May. 30 '07
ClimaxDesigns said on May. 30 '07
:) Yeah thats what I kept trying to do at first.
Welcome aboard Mudeth!
Cris Mccully said on May. 30 '07
For me first time i saw the logo i solved it for just 5 seconds. :)
emesghali said on May. 30 '07
but i agree that the seperation is a little too much for branding purposes.
perhaps reducing the spacing more so that its easier to tell or giving away the letters in some cases to make the connection easier.
Hayes Image said on May. 31 '07
I figured it out without, looking at the answer, very clever dude!
muku said on May. 31 '07
bjmramage said on May. 31 '07
i like it.
believe said on Jun. 01 '07
myoung1982 said on Jun. 01 '07
Cris Mccully said on Jun. 01 '07
Note: Don't open it first unless if you really don't know it. (Newbs)
http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/4978/232sv6.jpg
xzentrico said on Jun. 02 '07
I'm a newb. I only got the first and last two letters. Very cool!
dreamerworx said on Jun. 02 '07
spoiler said on Jun. 06 '07
brandsimplicity said on Jun. 07 '07
ManBear said on Jun. 13 '07
studiowacho said on Jun. 26 '07
musashitomoe said on Aug. 06 '07
raja said on Feb. 24 '08
actiondesigner said on Feb. 25 '08
raja said on Feb. 25 '08
heirophant said on Feb. 25 '08
OcularInk said on Feb. 25 '08
actiondesigner said on Feb. 25 '08
About the concept. The first part was the invitation. They would first receive one part. The second part they would receive either upon arrival or later in a second handout.
Also ...the businesscard or brochure have both parts. You are abel to put them together yourself. Just place them on top of each other. That is why I think this logo is so successful. Because you would be able to read this whenever you felt like it. They are constructed to fold or overlay each other. The first part of the concept was just to draw attention. Make you puzzle. That is why its so funny to read a lot of the posts. Dont blame them though.
KGB said on Feb. 25 '08
Sordoff said on Feb. 27 '08
Their logo was never beautiful but very intriguing. http://www.spencer.nildram.co.uk/
Lawrence Anderson said on Feb. 28 '08
varpho said on Sep. 17 '08
NeilMcDonald said on Sep. 17 '08
actiondesigner said on Oct. 02 '08
first ..thanks for liking it:) I remember this caused quit the stir when I uploaded it. (read through the comments:)) Must be one of the most looked at "logos" on the pond. And it divided the community into "I like" and "I hate". "I hate" where either people not getting it (taking it personal) or people not seeing it as a "logo". That its not legible or doesnt fit the predefined rules that people may have of what a logo should or should not be. Dont want to go over this again:) This LOGO:) fits the concept it was intended for. :)
NeilMcDonald said on Oct. 02 '08
actiondesigner said on Oct. 02 '08
logomotive said on Oct. 02 '08
JoePrince said on Mar. 12 '10
solideogloria said on Apr. 05 '11
oscarstoned said on May. 16 '11
Please login/register to make a comment, registration is easy, signup