but there is a paintball company here (Toronto area) that I drive by sometimes whose logo looks almost identical to the untrained eye...no cause for alarm since you are just playing around. also the name eludes me right now or I would have googled it
I should've mentioned that this is just a doodle to go on a back of my card, not a logo or a personal brand. Something to take a better advantage of the letterpress process and get some nice textural effect out of it.
Started with a square, like in the avatar, then rounded the corners, then rounded them more, got a boring circle, added wobble to the edge, then added more wobble - still looked too rigid and geometrical - then eroded the wobble and arrived at this. So this is meant to be more of an erosion effect rather than a splatter.
Got the cards. Not exactly how I wanted them... in fact, quite a bit off in terms of actual appearance vs. the original design, but here's a photo anyway -
See how the font appears to have lighter weight than on the logo image? That's the problem. The impression area flowed over its boundaries and carried the ink with it.
^ Having worked with letterpress before I'm assuming the card is double ply ( for lack of a better term ) and the embossing doesn't show on the opposite side. Regarding the visual weight of the type, you usually have to bump up the type to compensate. Embossing has a way of making it look thinner than it actually is. Regardless, looks nice dude!
epsilon said on
May. 05 '10
Actually, no, Kev, it's not duplexed. It's a single ply with a shallow impression, so it creates virtually no show through on even this relatively thin stock (160#).
From what I gather it requires certain skill to letterpress this way, and that's the reason why so many letterpress shops strongly recommend to use thick stock (of 220# and up) when a show through is not desired.
This part they did really great. What didn't quite work out is "this":http://swapped.cc/tmp/letterpress.jpg (click on 'this').
epsilon said on
May. 05 '10
Glen, that's not an emboss. Emboss is when the force is applied to the back to make the front pop. And with the letterpress the force is applied to the front to make an impression on the front itself, and this may or may not create a show-through on the back.
That's letterpress for you :) When I worked at a letterpress printer's whilst I was at design school...(memories) I was always instructed to tell designers to losen their kerning 5 - 15pt more than they normally would, to compensate for the impression.
rudy hurtado said on Apr. 23 '10
mcdseven said on Apr. 23 '10
jonnyd said on Apr. 23 '10
epsilon said on Apr. 23 '10
epsilon said on Apr. 27 '10
logomotive said on Apr. 27 '10
logoboom said on Apr. 27 '10
raja said on Apr. 28 '10
epsilon said on Apr. 28 '10
raja said on Apr. 29 '10
but there is a paintball company here (Toronto area) that I drive by sometimes whose logo looks almost identical to the untrained eye...no cause for alarm since you are just playing around. also the name eludes me right now or I would have googled it
This would look awesome letterpressed btw
logoboom said on Apr. 29 '10
epsilon said on Apr. 29 '10
@raja - Oh, this one?
I should've mentioned that this is just a doodle to go on a back of my card, not a logo or a personal brand. Something to take a better advantage of the letterpress process and get some nice textural effect out of it.
Started with a square, like in the avatar, then rounded the corners, then rounded them more, got a boring circle, added wobble to the edge, then added more wobble - still looked too rigid and geometrical - then eroded the wobble and arrived at this. So this is meant to be more of an erosion effect rather than a splatter.
badovsky said on Apr. 29 '10
epsilon said on May. 05 '10
"http://www.flickr.com/photos/37230902@N04/4582780102/":http://www.flickr.com/photos/37230902@N04/4582780102 <= clicky-click
See how the font appears to have lighter weight than on the logo image? That's the problem. The impression area flowed over its boundaries and carried the ink with it.
michaelspitz said on May. 05 '10
logomotive said on May. 05 '10
raja said on May. 05 '10
logoboom said on May. 05 '10
Ocularink said on May. 05 '10
epsilon said on May. 05 '10
From what I gather it requires certain skill to letterpress this way, and that's the reason why so many letterpress shops strongly recommend to use thick stock (of 220# and up) when a show through is not desired.
This part they did really great. What didn't quite work out is "this":http://swapped.cc/tmp/letterpress.jpg (click on 'this').
epsilon said on May. 05 '10
Hayes Image said on May. 05 '10
Ocularink said on May. 06 '10
mabu said on Jun. 16 '10
JoePrince said on Nov. 02 '10
Please login/register to make a comment, registration is easy, signup