Home

nice mark but indeed the type is a little bit standart, maybe try avenir or fedra. But than you have to match the sharpness of the mark a bit more open. a little less bold and below the cut out to make it an 'a' a little more: 1 or 2 mm would make a difference.. succes

I like it as it is. Only noticed a little thing, the 'I' seems a tad off.*Very nice anyway.

I like its simplicitiy but find the %22a%22 not obvious at first glance. The mark has a faux Cyrillic typography look to it. My eye wants to see a %22BF%22.*Perhaps you can make the triangle the same length as the square, perhaps not. Maybe cut out another triangle to the top left rather.**I would have the type as high as the inner square (if it is not already the case), something like Frutiger™ 55 Roman would do the job.**In terms of presentation, it would look better with the clearer color of the gradient being closer to that of the more red color.**In terms of marketing, your website address will be confused with this name. Maybe think about either removing the last two letters of your name for the logo, or getting the other domain - just in case.

LogoPond does not show the backwards letter %22R%22 nor the trademark sign. :%5E(

Friends, thanks for your comments! :)**%3Cb%3ETo cjiske%3C/b%3E: Thanks for suggesting typeface, I will try those and other also and if i wont find a suitable one I shall make a custom typeface for that. Reagrding sybmol, I have caculated the negative and positive space on a grid of 16x16 pixel, I did other variation also and this one fits best among all.**%3Cb%3ETo Art Machine%3C/b%3E: Yes, I agree with you %22the 'I' seems a tad off. %3B) I will take care of it. Thanks! :)**%3Cb%3ETo dache%3C/b%3E: First of all, thanks a lot for your comment. Yes you are right the %22a%22 is not obvious at first glance. I made it intentionally, as i wanted to create a visual tention between square form and %22a%22 letterform. The type is as high as the inner square, Height of inner square and type is same.